Because the volume in a 5x5 routine is more than sufficient for a beginner, to stimulate hypertrophy. Furthermore, I dont think that strength's contribution to size should be overlooked. If you jump right into a high-rep scheme, your strength advqnces will plateau much sooner. Without going too indepth, youre never going to get seriously big, without moving some relatively heavy weights. With a 5x5 routine, youre merely building the foundation, after which you can then specialize.I'd like to see some actual studies on that.
I think there's a reason that most entry-level exercise programs start people out with 10 reps. It's only entry-level strength-building programs that recommend 5 reps.
If the goal is hypertrophy, why not immediately jump into the 8 to 12 rep range, where it's been shown hypertrophy most effectively happens?
Because the volume in a 5x5 routine is more than sufficient for a beginner, to stimulate hypertrophy. Furthermore, I dont think that strength's contribution to size should be overlooked. If you jump right into a high-rep scheme, your strength advqnces will plateau much sooner. Without going too indepth, youre never going to get seriously big, without moving some relatively heavy weights.
The research on it is fairly limited IIRC. Feel free to cite data that supports your claim, though.Plenty of people have significantly increased their size and strength without dropping below 8 reps.
And again, I don't think it's a coincidence that the vast majority of beginner exercise programs target 10 reps as a starting point.
If you have any studies that show that a beginner starting with a routine like 5x5 instead of a more traditional 3x10 leads to greater gains in hypertrophy then I'd be interested in reading them.
So doing 5x5 or SS is betetr than just doing 3 sets of 10 on basic lifts ?
Basically this. All that really matters beyond that are the small details such as correct form, which you can Google or lookup in any men's fitness issue, and knowing how to push your body and allow adequate rest without overdoing either.
I always like to go big and then work 2-3 or even 4 sets together in a continuous series, so say:
Fly bench with two 35s - 10 reps
Dips - 15 reps
Military dumbells with 30s - 10 reps
Plank for as long as you can hold it - although 30secs to a minute is great
Or I might start with the military lifts, in which case I'd go with like 45s and then probably just 30 or 25 on the flys
Just start doing shit, read up, always stretch, get a feel for it, listen to your body and get a pump on, breh.
Plenty of people have significantly increased their size and strength without dropping below 8 reps.
And again, I don't think it's a coincidence that the vast majority of beginner exercise programs target 10 reps as a starting point.
If you have any studies that show that a beginner starting with a routine like 5x5 instead of a more traditional 3x10 leads to greater gains in hypertrophy then I'd be interested in reading them.
The research on it is fairly limited IIRC. Feel free to cite data that supports your claim, though.
I don't know if you guys are interested, but r/advancedfitness had been talking about this a lot recently. Lots of great threads with great info. Studies seem to show you can build size equally from just about any rep range.
Here's just one thread on it:
https://www.reddit.com/r/AdvancedFi...ngth_and_hypertrophy_adaptations_between_low/
Plenty of people have significantly increased their size and strength without dropping below 8 reps.
And again, I don't think it's a coincidence that the vast majority of beginner exercise programs target 10 reps as a starting point.
If you have any studies that show that a beginner starting with a routine like 5x5 instead of a more traditional 3x10 leads to greater gains in hypertrophy then I'd be interested in reading them.