- Joined
- Sep 16, 2017
- Messages
- 1,718
- Reaction score
- 0
oh no, you have to wait? poor guy
just let the poor die so you don't have to wait? gotta love merica
Less than 0.2% of ER visits are in danger of dying. I’m sorry you ran out of your narcs
oh no, you have to wait? poor guy
just let the poor die so you don't have to wait? gotta love merica
Who are you, his dad? He can answer his own questions.
Less than 0.2% of ER visits are in danger of dying. I’m sorry you ran out of your narcs
But you're fine with a policy choice that would result in less overall healthcare in society?
Upon someone's claim that we should abolish slavery on ethical grounds, would your counter then be, "Yeah but who will pick the cotton?"
But you're fine with a policy choice that would result in less overall healthcare in society?
On ethical grounds, "who will pick the cotton?" doesn't counter the ethical basis for the position.
We're on a public forum. I just see him getting ganged up on, and I generally like evening out the numbers.
We're on a public forum. I just see him getting ganged up on, and I generally like evening out the numbers.
The white knight Greoric to the rescue..!
Yep...
Exactly.
But isn't that a contradiction? You're not fine with less healthcare in society but you are fine with policy choices that would result in less healthcare in society.
So are you
More like the Joker in the is context....
Are you being purposefully dense?
Healthcare costs are fine.
Right, it also doesn't make a policy or economic argument either.