- Joined
- Feb 2, 2016
- Messages
- 34,002
- Reaction score
- 0
40,000-year-old bracelet made by extinct human species found(Christian/Alpha call out thread)
- Thread starter VivaRevolution
- Start date
- Joined
- Aug 31, 2014
- Messages
- 3,056
- Reaction score
- 1
they also found a 50,000yr old bone sewing needle
http://www.dailymail.co.uk/sciencet...wing-instrument-discovered-Siberian-Cave.html
http://www.dailymail.co.uk/sciencet...wing-instrument-discovered-Siberian-Cave.html
- Joined
- Nov 7, 2012
- Messages
- 7,004
- Reaction score
- 1
Absolutely every action have consequences, one does not need a religion to understand that.
- Joined
- Aug 31, 2014
- Messages
- 3,056
- Reaction score
- 1
i should have finished the thought
consequences after death
- Joined
- Feb 2, 2016
- Messages
- 34,002
- Reaction score
- 0
True, but alot of times their is a short term benefit, and you have to be intelligent to see the tail risk involved in that near term payoff.
Dumb people are dangerous in this way.
- Joined
- Sep 5, 2012
- Messages
- 22,607
- Reaction score
- 0
Good lord Viva where to begin with this?40,000-year-old bracelet made by extinct human species found
LISTEN | PRINT
BY STEPHEN MORGAN MAY 8, 2015 IN SCIENCE
In what is quite an amazing discovery, scientists have confirmed that a bracelet found in Siberia is 40,000 years old. This makes it the oldest piece of jewelry ever discovered, and archeologists have been taken aback by the level of its sophistication.
The Denisovan cave in Siberia
Anatoly Derevyanko and Mikhail Shunkov, Vera Salnitskaya
We know that the Denisovans migrated out of Africa sometime after the first wave of Homo erectus, and well before us, Homo sapiens.
READ MORE: First physical map of the Internet produced
The Denisovans were unique in many ways, having branched away from other humanoid ancestors some 1 million years ago. Indeed, the recent discovery of a female Denisovan finger bone and various teeth shows that they had no morphological similarities to either Neanderthals or modern humans.
However, tens of thousands of years later, and prior to becoming extinct, they did coexist with us and the Neanderthals for a period, and skeletal remains of hybrids, and genetic studies confirm that they also mated with our forebears and the Neanderthals.
Strangely, however, DNA evidence also suggests that, at some point, the Denisovans must have interbred with an as yet unknown and undiscovered species of humans beings.
Skeletal remains show that the Denisovans were probably far more robust and powerful than modern humans, and were, until now, assumed to be a more primitive, archaic type of humans than us.
But, the discovery of the bracelet suggests this was far from true. Amazingly, the skill involved in making this adornment shows a level of technique at least 30,000 years ahead of its time.
Until now, scientists had believed that such skills had only evolved among humans in the Neolithic period, which began at about 10,000 BC. Indeed, originally, they believed that the bracelet had somehow become mixed up with materials dating from a later period.
However, experiments have now definitely ruled that out, and they confirm that it could not have been made by homo sapiens or Neanderthals. After 7 years of analysis, the scientists are confident that the piece was made 30,000 years before the beginning of the Stone Age.
http://www.digitaljournal.com/scien...tinct-human-species-discovered/article/432798
______________________________________________________________________________
Just to make this thread interesting, i am curious what our Christian war roomer's think about the idea that 40,000 years ago, Homo Erectus, were banging neanderthals, and other sub-species of humans.
Seems like quite the thing for the bible to leave out.
You know when Eve's daughter started banging Igor, you would think this would be noteworthy.
Wonder what great sin Neanderthals, and this sub-species committed for the hand of god to make them extinct, and why the bible would leave them out.
Also, for all you Alpha's out there, Neanderthal, and Denisovan's, were physically superior to homo erectus. Guess who the real survivor was?
Spoiler alert, it wasn't the species that could bench the 275 bro. Sounds kind of Beta.
You take a wonderful story then muddy the waters with your interesting opinion at the end.
- Joined
- Feb 2, 2016
- Messages
- 34,002
- Reaction score
- 0
R
ripskater
Guest
Homo Neanderthals existed before there was gay marriage. But they died out cause they did not reproduce.
- Joined
- Feb 2, 2016
- Messages
- 34,002
- Reaction score
- 0
wut ?
- Joined
- Jun 13, 2005
- Messages
- 61,626
- Reaction score
- 25,718
As dumb as promised.
- Joined
- Dec 16, 2015
- Messages
- 45,244
- Reaction score
- 6,619
It's an aggressive opinion, but it's also true that something like 40% of adults would not want this amazing discovery taught in public schools (most being older and no longer active parents, but they pay the property taxes).
- Joined
- Feb 2, 2016
- Messages
- 34,002
- Reaction score
- 0
they also found a 50,000yr old bone sewing needle
http://www.dailymail.co.uk/sciencet...wing-instrument-discovered-Siberian-Cave.html
Ever seen this?
Clovis First / Single origin hypothesis[edit]
Main article: Settlement of the Americas
Known as "Clovis First," the predominant hypothesis among archaeologists in the latter half of the 20th century had been that the people associated with the Clovis culture were the first inhabitants of the Americas. The primary support for this was that no solid evidence of pre-Clovis human habitation had been found. According to the standard accepted theory, the Clovis people crossed the Beringia land bridge over the Bering Strait from Siberia to Alaska during the period of lowered sea levels during the ice age, then made their way southward through an ice-free corridor east of the Rocky Mountains in present-day Western Canada as the glaciers retreated.[38]
This hypothesis came to be challenged by studies suggesting a pre-Clovis human occupation of the Americas.[39] In 2011, following the excavation of an occupation site at Buttermilk Creek, Texas, a prominent group of scientists claimed to have definitely established the existence "of an occupation older than Clovis."[40][41]
According to researchers Michael Waters and Thomas Stafford of Texas A&M University, new radiocarbon dates place Clovis remains from the continental United States in a shorter time window beginning 450 years later than the previously accepted threshold (13,200 to 12,900 BP).[2]
Recently the scientific consensus has changed to acknowledge the presence of pre-Clovis cultures in the Americas, ending the "Clovis first" consensus.[42][43][44]
The results of a multiple-author study by Danish, Canadian and American scientists published in Nature in February 2016 revealed that "the first Americans, whether Clovis or earlier groups in unglaciated North America before 12.6 cal. kyr BP", are "unlikely" to "have travelled to North America from Siberia via the Bering land bridge[45] "via a corridor that opened up between the melting ice sheets in what is now Alberta and B.C. about 13,000 years ago" as many anthropologists have argued for decades.[46] The lead author, Mikkel Pedersen - a PhD student from University of Copenhagen - explained, "The ice-free corridor was long considered the principal entry route for the first Americans ... Our results reveal that it simply opened up too late for that to have been possible."[46] The scientists argued that by 10,000 years ago, the ice-free corridor in what is now Alberta and B.C "was gradually taken over by a boreal forest dominated by spruce and pine trees" and that "Clovis people likely came from the south, not the north, perhaps following wild animals such as bison."[45][46]
___________________________________________________________________________
So if they came from the south, how did they get there?
Seems the Native Americans came by an Ice bridge theory is rather flawed.
- Joined
- Apr 11, 2015
- Messages
- 18,944
- Reaction score
- 13,327
Sound like any club of europe with fat girls/cougars at 4 AM
- Joined
- Feb 2, 2016
- Messages
- 34,002
- Reaction score
- 0
40,000-year-old bracelet made by extinct human species found
LISTEN | PRINT
BY STEPHEN MORGAN MAY 8, 2015 IN SCIENCE
In what is quite an amazing discovery, scientists have confirmed that a bracelet found in Siberia is 40,000 years old. This makes it the oldest piece of jewelry ever discovered, and archeologists have been taken aback by the level of its sophistication.
The Denisovan cave in Siberia
Anatoly Derevyanko and Mikhail Shunkov, Vera Salnitskaya
We know that the Denisovans migrated out of Africa sometime after the first wave of Homo erectus, and well before us, Homo sapiens.
READ MORE: First physical map of the Internet produced
The Denisovans were unique in many ways, having branched away from other humanoid ancestors some 1 million years ago. Indeed, the recent discovery of a female Denisovan finger bone and various teeth shows that they had no morphological similarities to either Neanderthals or modern humans.
However, tens of thousands of years later, and prior to becoming extinct, they did coexist with us and the Neanderthals for a period, and skeletal remains of hybrids, and genetic studies confirm that they also mated with our forebears and the Neanderthals.
Strangely, however, DNA evidence also suggests that, at some point, the Denisovans must have interbred with an as yet unknown and undiscovered species of humans beings.
Skeletal remains show that the Denisovans were probably far more robust and powerful than modern humans, and were, until now, assumed to be a more primitive, archaic type of humans than us.
But, the discovery of the bracelet suggests this was far from true. Amazingly, the skill involved in making this adornment shows a level of technique at least 30,000 years ahead of its time.
Until now, scientists had believed that such skills had only evolved among humans in the Neolithic period, which began at about 10,000 BC. Indeed, originally, they believed that the bracelet had somehow become mixed up with materials dating from a later period.
However, experiments have now definitely ruled that out, and they confirm that it could not have been made by homo sapiens or Neanderthals. After 7 years of analysis, the scientists are confident that the piece was made 30,000 years before the beginning of the Stone Age.
http://www.digitaljournal.com/scien...tinct-human-species-discovered/article/432798
______________________________________________________________________________
Just to make this thread interesting, i am curious what our Christian war roomer's think about the idea that 40,000 years ago, Homo Erectus, were banging neanderthals, and other sub-species of humans.
Seems like quite the thing for the bible to leave out.
You know when Eve's daughter started banging Igor, you would think this would be noteworthy.
Wonder what great sin Neanderthals, and this sub-species committed for the hand of god to make them extinct, and why the bible would leave them out.
Also, for all you Alpha's out there, Neanderthal, and Denisovan's, were physically superior to homo erectus. Guess who the real survivor was?
Spoiler alert, it wasn't the species that could bench the 275 bro. Sounds kind of Beta.
Very cool.
As for the Christian thing, I think we are at the point where most of us realize the book isn't quite right... we're just trying to live the message of Jesus.
- Joined
- Mar 21, 2006
- Messages
- 23,030
- Reaction score
- 1,883
Edit
Last edited:
