- Joined
- May 30, 2011
- Messages
- 37,009
- Reaction score
- 9,182
Link
I do believe that USADA is doing its job, but how many fights have been scrapped before proving the fighter is indeed guilty? Is this correct?
After all, most have paid for training camp that includes their trainers, sparring partners, location, etc.
And they don't get their money back. So is it fair to the fighter?
But if the fight is not cancelled, is it fair to the opposing fighter?
I know it is a complex issue... but what would be the best option?
What think you?
“I’ll try to defend myself. A diuretic substance has been identified in my test and I don’t use diuretics. I do a strict diet in advance [of my fights] to not have major problems with weight loss. I’m going to find a specialist lawyer to figure out what we’re going to do.”
As far as what consequences he’ll face as a result of the failed drug test, Nogueira has decided to take a more positive approach.
“I believe in my innocence and I don’t want to think of the worst. I’m sad to have the [next] fight canceled now. This situation is very difficult. Let’s wait for what is decided from now on.”
I do believe that USADA is doing its job, but how many fights have been scrapped before proving the fighter is indeed guilty? Is this correct?
After all, most have paid for training camp that includes their trainers, sparring partners, location, etc.
And they don't get their money back. So is it fair to the fighter?
But if the fight is not cancelled, is it fair to the opposing fighter?
I know it is a complex issue... but what would be the best option?
What think you?