D
Deleted member 391673
Guest
i was watching some youtubes compilation of slam knockouts and noticed that a lot of the slams seem to cause to KO because the opponent hits the back of his head on impact.
i know spiking on the neck is illegal and so is intentionally targeting the back of the head, but why is a move - particularly a forward slam (i don't know technical term for it) - not considered illegal when it seems obvious that the back of the head is a major target.
i'm not suggesting making slams illegal, just curious why it's not....
i know spiking on the neck is illegal and so is intentionally targeting the back of the head, but why is a move - particularly a forward slam (i don't know technical term for it) - not considered illegal when it seems obvious that the back of the head is a major target.
i'm not suggesting making slams illegal, just curious why it's not....