Who has a list of all positive UFC USADA tests?

waiguoren

Double Yellow Card
Double Yellow Card
Joined
Apr 8, 2009
Messages
15,112
Reaction score
0
@dimspace

I found a list here but it hasn't been updated.

Justin Ledet
Josh Barnett
Lyman Good

These guys need to be added. Anyone keeping an up-to-date list?
 
Dana has the list.


Oh, I guess you wanted the actual list, not who has the list. J/K
 
@spacedim maybe
 
@dimspace has kept track of the entire USADA/UFC program, not just the postive tests. The link I have for his google doc is an old one though.

Here's a list of all the positives in MMA in general. If I stop updating it, Erik Magraken has a good list over at combatsportslaw.com :
 
and simple list

tNXOWg.png

j8Bkmb.png
 
@dimspace has kept track of the entire USADA/UFC program, not just the postive tests. The link I have for his google doc is an old one though.

Yeh, its not on google now.

theres a perma link in this post https://lightatheendofthetunnelisdi.../ufcusada-testing-and-statistics-spreadsheet/

its in my cloud now and just stays there, uploading to google each time was a pain in the arse and it became way too cumbersome for google and some of the formulas (which are complicated) google was just fucking up (just means it has to be downloaded to view now rather than viewed online)
 
lol @ not removing proven innocent jon jones. corrupt organization

had Jones been found innocent I would have moved him to the "no fault finding/exonerated/warnings" section

he wasnt, so i didnt
 
It's a disgrace that UFC hasn't introduced a lifetime ban for cheating
 
had Jones been found innocent I would have moved him to the "no fault finding/exonerated/warnings" section

he wasnt, so i didnt
"On the evidence before the Panel, the Applicant is not a drug cheat," the arbitrators wrote in their epilogue. "He did not know that the tablet he took contained prohibited substances"
 
"On the evidence before the Panel, the Applicant is not a drug cheat," the arbitrators wrote in their epilogue. "He did not know that the tablet he took contained prohibited substances"

he was banned for a year.. he is serving a suspension

i list people based on actual factual accuracy, not on who i think should be on which list.

anyway, im sure theres plenty of threads about it for you to go cry in
 
"On the evidence before the Panel, the Applicant is not a drug cheat," the arbitrators wrote in their epilogue. "He did not know that the tablet he took contained prohibited substances"

13.1. The Panel repeats that the Applicant's fault was at the top end of the scale. In short, the Applicant made an advance enquiry about a product Cialis which he did not take. He made no enquiry at all about the Tadalafil pill which he did take. He simply relied upon his team mate to tell him what it was and how it could enhance sexual pleasure. His degree of fault in fact verged on the reckless. It therefore concludes that the maximum sanction of twelve months subject only to the deduction of the period of suspension served will be consonant with the facts as found. It notes that the maximum penalty for specified substances is half that required by the WADC and cannot be said to infringe any principle of proportionality.

And the label on the package he took:

"TADALAFIL 30 MG x 40 23 This Product is for CHEMICAL RESEARCH USE ONLY. NOT INTENDED FOR HUMAN CONSUMPTION/USE. WARNING: If product is ingested accidently contact Poison Control. (…) This product is not a drug, food, or cosmetic and should not be misbranded, misused or mislabelled (sic) as a drug, food or cosmetic. (…)"
 
he was banned for a year.. he is serving a suspension

i list people based on actual factual accuracy, not on who i think should be on which list.

anyway, im sure theres plenty of threads about it for you to go cry in
i literally just copy pasted from the actual verdict itself clearing him of all cheating and you refuse to remove him? no bias there at all
 
he was banned for a year.. he is serving a suspension

i list people based on actual factual accuracy, not on who i think should be on which list.

anyway, im sure theres plenty of threads about it for you to go cry in

It's fact from the hearing there pal!
 
i literally just copy pasted from the actual verdict itself clearing him of all cheating and you refuse to remove him? no bias there at all

he was not cleared, he was suspended for a year by both USADA and Nevada Athletic Comission.

So no, its a list of SUSPENSIONS and he is SUSPENDED until July 2017

raw
 
i literally just copy pasted from the actual verdict itself clearing him of all cheating and you refuse to remove him? no bias there at all
It said he wasn't a drug cheat, it didn't say he didn't deserve a suspension, or that he didn't violate the ADP. He did, and got the maximum suspension under the policy for what he took.
 
Back
Top