30-27 Knight???

welcometohavoc said:
I have zero problem with it. Clearly won the first and amirkhani did ZERO in both the next two rounds. Laying on someone for 8 mins is not fighting
Click to expand...

It wasn’t just Amirkhani. Knight had him locked in rubber guard to stall for a standup.
 
RiotWyatt said:
It wasn’t just Amirkhani. Knight had him locked in rubber guard to stall for a standup.
Click to expand...
Any time there was any seperation knight was going for triangles, armbars, leg locks.. While Amir just tried held on
 
Krimzon said:
??
do you mean the new unified rules which state that guard is a neutral position??
Click to expand...
It doesn't actually say that. Actions are considered more than their position, but top position still matters. Shall I quote it for you?

And guess what, the Fin controlled the cage ;)
 
CrimsonFan said:
Any time there was any seperation knight was going for triangles, armbars, leg locks.. While Amir just tried held on
Click to expand...

Makwan did land some bombs when they had separation too dude.

Can’t ignore just because you don’t like his antics.
 
Muay Thai #1 said:
I mean, Knight won the fight... but not 30-27.

I could possibly see 29-27
Click to expand...

Yeah but that means that the other judges got it wrong so if you are going to blame only one of the judges it looks biased. Why don't you blame the other judges?
 
RiotWyatt said:
Makwan did land some bombs when they had separation too dude.

Can’t ignore just because you don’t like his antics.
Click to expand...
What antics? I dont know anything about the guy apart from the fight i just saw.

And i saw knight handily winning the striking
 
I bet its the same judge that almost got Pedrosoli robbed. Fire that fool.
 
Boonedoggle said:
It doesn't actually say that. Actions are considered more than their position, but top position still matters. Shall I quote it for you?

And guess what, the Fin controlled the cage ;)
Click to expand...
yes, please quote the part where it says the top position fighter is winning.
 
Krimzon said:
yes, please quote the part where it says the top position fighter is winning.
Click to expand...
"Top and bottom position fighters are assessed more on the impactful/effective result of their actions, more so than their position."

More than their position, meaning position matters, just not as much.

No where does it say guard is a netural position like you said.
 
Boonedoggle said:
"Top and bottom position fighters are assessed more on the impactful/effective result of their actions, more so than their position."

More than their position, meaning position matters, just not as much.

No where does it say guard is a netural position like you said.
Click to expand...
but nowhere also does it state that top is the winning position. From the looks of it Knight was mission octagon controlling makwan at will.
 
milenss said:
Yeah but that means that the other judges got it wrong so if you are going to blame only one of the judges it looks biased. Why don't you blame the other judges?
Click to expand...
I'm not blaming anyone. What are you even talking about?
 
GnrlDisarray said:
Yeah that was one of the most retarded scores ever. The judge must've had a dog in this fight.
Click to expand...
the only thing more retarded then that score is Knight's fight IQ I had him winning but that was just stupid in the first.
 
Krimzon said:
but nowhere also does it state that top is the winning position. From the looks of it Knight was mission octagon controlling makwan at will.
Click to expand...
You're either being obtuse or your reading comprehension needs some work. This is an amendment for the original rules that states top position is "winning."
 
Boonedoggle said:
You're either being obtuse or your reading comprehension needs some work. This is an amendment for the original rules that states top position is "winning."
Click to expand...
breh, i have the reading comprehension of an oxford scholar, where does it say that the top position is wininng? And how did it override Knight actively controlling position?
 
Definitely the definition of a draw if knockdowns count for anything.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Latest posts

Forum statistics

Threads
1,237,074
Messages
55,465,670
Members
174,785
Latest member
JoyceOuthw

Share this page

Back
Top