- Joined
- Aug 5, 2017
- Messages
- 6,818
- Reaction score
- 5,518
Bro you keep falling into the same traps over and over. Thanks for solidifying my points even more.Fucking bleacher report links showing up as garbage BRB
https://www.espn.com/nba/insider/story/_/id/8162699/nba-ranking-top-10-big-3s-all-time
- DeCandre Jordan being cited as part of the Flops big 3
https://www.forbes.com/sites/tomvan...orst-big-threes-for-the-buck/?sh=ceb5b1ecb24a
All kinds of can trios being labeled by the media as Big 3s over the years?
From the first article you posted:
“With so many superstars teaming up over the past five seasons, you might be tempted to think the NBA's current "Big 3" era (touched off by the Celtics' acquisitions of Ray Allen and Kevin Garnett in the summer of 2007)”
From the second article:
“Subtle forms of the Big Three have existed for years, but the concept really took off in 2008 when the Boston Celtics spent recently-cleared salary cap space on Kevin Garnett and Ray Allen, who teamed with Paul Pierce to capture an NBA title.”
Literally the second article is about a modified “big 3” for that season based on budgeting salaries lmao. Did you even read the article?
“Here are the NBA’s top six and bottom six teams in bang for the Big Three buck”
Anyone can post a list of who they think are a big three. That was never the issue, it’s the general idea you stated that there was a definition with your made up nonsense of ppg totals.
Idk who’s worse, you or ferris lmao