"You're a casual if..."

The fallacy would be you posted in the UFC section of the forums when you topic has nothing to do with the UFC just being a casual vs fan.

Kudos though for the effort??
 
The fallacy would be you posted in the UFC section of the forums when you topic has nothing to do with the UFC just being a casual vs fan.

Kudos though for the effort??
You failed critical thinking it appears
 
Philosophy 1 or critical thinking was a favorite of mine back in college

big bonus points for anyone who can tell me what fallacy is being committed with the above, the presumptuous premise in this being I'm an expert and you're a noob

it's a terrible argument especially when the fights indeed sucked ass

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_fallacies
Your a casual if..........
You think Matt Hughes having a train accident meant he pissed in his pants while riding a train.
You think War Machine is in the Department of Defense.
You tell Michael Bisping to look at me when i'm talking to you because one of his eyes is looking away.
You think an upper decker is a home run to the top of the stands
You think BJ Penn is a porn star.
You think take care of your underwears is something you hear at the laundromat.
You think snake in the grass is something found in the Everglades.
 
If you're crying when the Irishman got knocked out
4wyjti16a1d035bfc77cb5.gif
That’s not what happened in that video.
He’s a Poirier fan and was just so happy for him
 
You’re a casual if you believe Joe Rogan anytime he says a submission attempt is real tight and locked in. For a guy who is a black belt, it’s really confusing how he can’t see a fighter clearly working towards an escape. lol
 
You're a casual if you cannot name 100 MMA fighters
 
Nobody is rewatching last nights fights out of appreciation of the nuances

it means you have no life

those fights sucked
 
You know you're a casual if you don't worship and jerk off too middle school sized manlets fighting.

You know you're a casual when you can't appreciate hard fought, technical, beautiful high IQ, philosophical fights like Rozenstruik vs Gane and consider them boring.

You know you're a casual if you don't willingly suck off everything the UFC does and pays and thanks the ufc for their overpriced & mediocre cards.
 
Philosophy 1 or critical thinking was a favorite of mine back in college

big bonus points for anyone who can tell me what fallacy is being committed with the above, the presumptuous premise in this being I'm an expert and you're a noob

it's a terrible argument especially when the fights indeed sucked ass

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_fallacies
Don’t need the wiki page to tell me it’s circular reasoning
 
You're a casual if:

- between 2005-2007 you only watched if Chuck was fighting
- between 2008-2011 you only watched if Brock was fighting
- between 2013-2015 you only watched if Ronda was fighting
- between 2015-now you only watch if Conor is fighting
 
I had to google it to remind myself. For some reason I thought Nicco Montano was still a champ
Shevchenko has had the belt for over 2 years, and defended her title 4 times. If you honestly thought Nicco was still the champ, you are indeed a casual.
 
If your not rocking an Anderson Aldo kit on the reg.

Screenshot_from_2015-12-01_10_54_13.0.0.png
 
Shevchenko has had the belt for over 2 years, and defended her title 4 times. If you honestly thought Nicco was still the champ, you are indeed a casual.
Probably. It's not an insult to me though. I don't really follow wmma
 
You're a casual if:

- between 2005-2007 you only watched if Chuck was fighting
- between 2008-2011 you only watched if Brock was fighting
- between 2013-2015 you only watched if Ronda was fighting
- between 2015-now you only watch if Conor is fighting
Pretty much.
 
If you think that Conor McGregor is the greatest (mma) fighter of all-time, you might be a casual.

latest
 
Back
Top