Your life depends on which Quarterback you choose to win one game

against my lions no less smh Detroit lions=worst pro sports franchise in American history
 
Somebody who can do it all, so Rodgers followed by Wilson

Definitely not a guy who forgets what down it is late in games
 
I only watched American Football in the 80s and early 90s. From what I saw, I'd choose Joe Montana. Tremendous under pressure.
 
Joe Montana
Among active quarterbacks: ask again after the playoffs. Right now I'd say Aaron Rogers.
 
What's McCarthy's record without Rodgers again?

<Rodgers1>
You lost control of the point your side was trying to prove here, chief, because you just argued Tom's greatness by analogy to Rodgers, rather than continuing the attempt to argue Rodger's superiority by virtue of McCarthy's inferiority to Belichick. Might help if you figured out the underlying logic as an endgame before you wade in.
<TheDonald>

Moreover, I realize you don't know much about football, but would it kill you to actually learn the answers to the dumb shit that comes out of your mouth before you allow it to spill?

McCarthy (with Rodgers fielded)

Packers: 99-58 (63.1%)
2006: 0-2
2007: 1-1
2008: 6-10
2009: 11-5
2010: 10-5
2011: 14-1
2012: 11-5
2013: 6-3
2014: 12-4
2015: 10-6
2016: 10-6
2017: 4-3
2018: 4-7

Overall (with): 99-58 (63.1%)

McCarthy (without Rodgers ever taking the field)
Packers: 26-19-1 (56.5%)
2006: 8-6
2007: 12-2
2008: 0-0
2009: 0-0
2010: 0-1
2011: 1-0
2012: 0-0
2013: 2-4-1
2014: 0-0
2015: 0-0
2016: 0-0
2017: 3-6
2018: 0-0

Cowboys: 6-10 (37.5%)
Overall (w/o): 32-29-1 (51.6%)


Note that McCarthy's record on the Packers with only Favre fielded was higher (20-8, 71.4%) than it was with Rodgers. But to answer your question asking what McCarthy's record has been without Rodgers?

A winning one. Unlike Belichick's.

bradyce011.jpg
 
You lost control of the point your side was trying to prove here, chief, because you just argued Tom's greatness by analogy to Rodgers, rather than continuing the attempt to argue Rodger's superiority by virtue of McCarthy's inferiority to Belichick. Might help if you figured out the underlying logic as an endgame before you wade in.
<TheDonald>

Moreover, I realize you don't know much about football, but would it kill you to actually learn the answers to the dumb shit that comes out of your mouth before you allow it to spill?

McCarthy (with Rodgers fielded)

Packers: 99-58 (63.1%)
2006: 0-2
2007: 1-1
2008: 6-10
2009: 11-5
2010: 10-5
2011: 14-1
2012: 11-5
2013: 6-3
2014: 12-4
2015: 10-6
2016: 10-6
2017: 4-3
2018: 4-7

Overall (with): 99-58 (63.1%)

McCarthy (without Rodgers ever taking the field)
Packers: 26-19-1 (56.5%)
2006: 8-6
2007: 12-2
2008: 0-0
2009: 0-0
2010: 0-1
2011: 1-0
2012: 0-0
2013: 2-4-1
2014: 0-0
2015: 0-0
2016: 0-0
2017: 3-6
2018: 0-0

Cowboys:
6-10 (37.5%)
Overall (w/o): 32-29-1 (51.6%)


Note that McCarthy's record on the Packers with only Favre fielded was higher (20-8, 71.4%) than it was with Rodgers. But to answer your question asking what McCarthy's record has been without Rodgers?

A winning one. Unlike Belichick's.

bradyce011.jpg

lol @ anyone reading that shit

Mick, I'll give you credit, your spread for Brady is the stuff of legend. But you attribute things to him that aren't his responsibility.
 
lol @ anyone reading that shit

Mick, I'll give you credit, your spread for Brady is the stuff of legend. But you attribute things to him that aren't his responsibility.
Concession accepted.
 
Fitzmagic of course
 
Back
Top