- Joined
- Nov 12, 2014
- Messages
- 29,253
- Reaction score
- 3,082
so wtf was with all the good news rhetoric coming from him and Malki?
the good news was they got a phone call from some lab they sent his supplement to saying it was "product-x"
so wtf was with all the good news rhetoric coming from him and Malki?
So, if Yoel's B sample comes back negative and they wanna appeal they go to litigation, right? How is that handled? Think it would be broadcast on Fight Pass like NAC hearings?They will need to independantly verify that the substance is contaminated.
If for instance it was Superman-X
Testing Yoels Superman-X proves nothing. They will need to go to the store, buy some Superman-X (ideally the same batch number), and test that.
As said before, being contaminated is one thing, contaminated by Sarm's, pretty rare. Will be interesting.
the only way this gets him off the hook is if the supplement contained compounds that were not listed. Then he can present it to the commission while suing the manufacturer.
Hence why they will go to the "store" and buy the supplement straight off the shelf (ideally with same batch number) and test that.
if that comes up negative hes probably screwed
he said at the end of the interview it was in pill form, which changes things slightly (perceptionwise)
I see, has the "tainted supplement" excuse ever worked for anyone before?the good news was they got a phone call from some lab they sent his supplement to saying it was "product-x"
So, if Yoel's B sample comes back negative and they wanna appeal they go to litigation, right? How is that handled? Think it would be broadcast on Fight Pass like NAC hearings?
Sounds like bullshit.
And he could have got a known tainted supplement afterwards and given it to USADA.
And who the fuck takes a supplement post fight.
Well, he's submitting the contaminated sample, unlike other fighters.So hes using the same excuse as 90% of fighters before him?
Dammit, why can't more fighters at least bring the lulz like Anderson did with unorthodox explanations?
Hence why they will go to the "store" and buy the supplement straight off the shelf (ideally with same batch number) and test that.
if that comes up negative hes probably screwed
he said at the end of the interview it was in pill form, which changes things slightly (perceptionwise)
Indeed. They will need to locate other samples from that batch that havnt been opened/touched by yoel etc.
What we must bear in mind is we are only hearing one side of the whole story, so it could be bullshit.
Oops, i forgot how to type. meant to say positiveB samples never ever come back negative.
Hahahahahaha.
He still gets busted.
Reems doc came and said he gave him testosterone without him knowing it. Reem still get a suspension.
This is such bullshit.
Only a Brazilian could think this up.
If the substance wasn't on the label he should be cleared.
So, if Yoel's B sample comes back negative and they wanna appeal they go to litigation, right? How is that handled? Think it would be broadcast on Fight Pass like NAC hearings?
lol Come on, Rob.
No.I see, has the "tainted supplement" excuse ever worked for anyone before?
Couldn't he have his people scour the internet to find out which supplements have a history of being tainted and claim he was taking those? Just how deeply are USADA going to investigate this? If he's never taken MuscleMan X5 but he claims he did (because he knows MuscleMan X5 is shady as fuck), will they have a way to verify that? Or will they just take his word?
No.
He's responsible for this.
It's not like there aren't supplements on the market that get tested.
Couldn't he have his people scour the internet to find out which supplements have a history of being tainted and claim he was taking those? Just how deeply are USADA going to investigate this? If he's never taken MuscleMan X5 but he claims he did (because he knows MuscleMan X5 is shady as fuck), will they have a way to verify that? Or will they just take his word?