WWE royal rumble woman's match gets billing over men's. Lol

[Amerikuracana]

They took the main event because they are women. They are not better. They do not generate more business. They do not work harder. They are worse. They generate less business. They work hard, but the guys do more.

So.. Is the struggle for women still real enough that a wrestling match with women should take top billing over men because of some comical "historical" angle? I mean, they were having women wrestle guys in the 90s, and it wasn't a big deal. But I digress..

Is this progress?

 

[irish_thug]

They took the main event because they are women. They are not better. They do not generate more business. They do not work harder. They are worse. They generate less business. They work hard, but the guys do more.

So.. Is the struggle for women still real enough that a wrestling match with women should take top billing over men because of some comical "historical" angle? I mean, they were having women wrestle guys in the 90s, and it wasn't a big deal. But I digress..

Is this progress?

It's so that people don't leave and miss the men's match.

 

[Rematch]

Dude... it's pro wrestling.

 

[JosephDredd]

Hey, any right ringers want to complain about people desperately nit-picking to feed their narratives? Or does that only happen in anti-Trump threads?

 

[sangreporsangre]

Is there actually a women's Rumble or is it just a title match headlining over the Rumble match itself? Because I'm pretty sure they've done that before, not with women but with the world title. I can't imagine a women's Royal Rumble, do they actually have enough women on the roster for that?

And if anyone complains about this being in the War Room I'll remind you that the sitting POTUS is a WWE Hall of Famer.

 

[Stoic1]

GLOW failed.

But my wife says the Netflix version is funny.

 

[VivaRevolution]

They took the main event because they are women. They are not better. They do not generate more business. They do not work harder. They are worse. They generate less business. They work hard, but the guys do more.

So.. Is the struggle for women still real enough that a wrestling match with women should take top billing over men because of some comical "historical" angle? I mean, they were having women wrestle guys in the 90s, and it wasn't a big deal. But I digress..

Is this progress?

Glass ceiling match, with TLC's?

 

[irish_thug]

GLOW failed.

But my wife says the Netflix version is funny.

I tried to watch it. It's a chick show with occasional titties.

 

[TheFirstEMP]

Bad business practices in the name of progressivism. Who cares? It’s their money.

 

[irish_thug]

Bad business practices in the name of progressivism. Who cares? It’s their money.

it's not a bad decision. it's an hour long match with sub-standard performers. That's a lot of time for people to lose interest. If the main match has already happened then it's not loss if people tune out or leave.

 

[Islam Imamate]

The divas seem like the only thing worth watching in pro-wrestling

If you disagree you are most likely a romo who likes watching guys wrestle with panties on.

 

[jk7707]

It's the first one ever so their trying to promote it. Also I love how a fucking WWE match is concerning you this much.

 

[Fawlty]

This is hilarious. My dear sweet Jesus, if I ever get to a place where I'm throwing a cultural-political hissy-fit over a wrasslin' publicity stunt, do that god-sent lightning bolt thing on me. Do it real good. Just jolt that shit right out of my head.

 

[SBJJ]

Jeez

RUSTLEMANIA

 

[Bloody Pulp]

 

[Fedorable]

Torrie Wilson in the top 5 hottest celebrities.

 

[ShadowRun]

It's probably because Ronda is going to get in and win it.

 

[Dave Poodle]

It's probably because Ronda is going to get in and win it.

Hahahaha. I hadn't thought of that. Prepare for Sherdog meltdown

 

[Amerikuracana]

It's probably because Ronda is going to get in and win it.

Not exactly.

 

[Islam Imamate]

Not exactly.

But if she did would that make up for it?