1. We now have a new forum called Fantasy Matchup Discussion. Access it here

Wrestling Dominance: In the Cage, In the Rules (WARNING: long-long read)

Discussion in 'Grappling Technique' started by gottoesplosivo, Sep 2, 2010.

  1. gottoesplosivo

    gottoesplosivo White Belt

    Joined:
    Feb 27, 2007
    Messages:
    125
    Likes Received:
    0
    Location:
    Padova, Italy
    I found this article very interesting, what do you think?


     
  2. Fedorzilla

    Fedorzilla Brown Belt

    Joined:
    Jul 15, 2008
    Messages:
    2,607
    Likes Received:
    2
    Location:
    Shanghai
    You're right, but judges are dumb. Everyone can objectively see A took B down. However, "offensive grappling" gets a bit murky without that in the majority of fights. Unless, of course you want to bring in grappling experts only to judge MMA fights.
     
  3. mtruitt76

    mtruitt76 Purple Belt

    Joined:
    Oct 2, 2008
    Messages:
    1,911
    Likes Received:
    5
    Location:
    Knoxville
    Man that was so poorly written that I could not finish the article.
     
  4. YeahBee

    YeahBee Samdog Original Nine

    Joined:
    Jun 19, 2006
    Messages:
    24,942
    Likes Received:
    11
    Location:
    Land of the Ice and Snow
    ^^Me neither

    I have no problem with a Grey Maynard approach, fighters need to get better takedown defense, scrambling and guardgame

    they just want to be saved by the refs
     
  5. SteelHammer

    SteelHammer Green Belt

    Joined:
    Jun 27, 2010
    Messages:
    1,046
    Likes Received:
    3
    Location:
    parts unknown Occupation: asskicker TrainingStyle:
    This is very true
     
  6. HomerPlata

    HomerPlata Purple Belt

    Joined:
    May 12, 2010
    Messages:
    1,649
    Likes Received:
    1
    Agreed. The writer was just wanking words all over the page. The desire for such vocubularic decadence has been erroneously exagerrated by the scribe, methinks.
     
  7. the sad part of these forums are, most sherdoggers would overlook this thread and instead post in another BJ Penn thread.
     
  8. HomerPlata

    HomerPlata Purple Belt

    Joined:
    May 12, 2010
    Messages:
    1,649
    Likes Received:
    1
    If it was written without the number 1 priority being "try too hard to impress everyone with my intelligence", it might actually be a worthwhile read. As it stands, it's just an ego piece.
     
  9. Thanks for the cliffnotes, i didn't read it...never said i was any different than other sherdoggers, LOL.
     
  10. gottoesplosivo

    gottoesplosivo White Belt

    Joined:
    Feb 27, 2007
    Messages:
    125
    Likes Received:
    0
    Location:
    Padova, Italy
    i didnt write the article,so whatever...i was just curious about some opinions
    and yes i know my english sucks and it's pretty basic,i'm an italian user always trying to improve my english
     
  11. b2spirita

    b2spirita Blue Belt

    Joined:
    Aug 24, 2010
    Messages:
    946
    Likes Received:
    0

    Its not badly written.
     
  12. yoder

    yoder Department of Evil belt

    Joined:
    Jan 22, 2006
    Messages:
    3,234
    Likes Received:
    0
    Location:
    The swamps of Florida.

    incorrect.

    the author was trying to hard, it was an unreadable mess.
     
  13. b2spirita

    b2spirita Blue Belt

    Joined:
    Aug 24, 2010
    Messages:
    946
    Likes Received:
    0

    Trying too hard is one thing, unreadable is another. It was perfectly readable.
     
  14. Hastur

    Hastur Orange Belt

    Joined:
    Aug 28, 2009
    Messages:
    266
    Likes Received:
    0
    Location:
    king's mountain
    Well I managed to read it...

    and I agree with most of it.
     
  15. HomerPlata

    HomerPlata Purple Belt

    Joined:
    May 12, 2010
    Messages:
    1,649
    Likes Received:
    1
    No, trying too hard with over-convoluted flowery language is the same thing as being unreadable.
     
  16. b2spirita

    b2spirita Blue Belt

    Joined:
    Aug 24, 2010
    Messages:
    946
    Likes Received:
    0

    No it is not, not by a long shot. It is perfectly readable to anyone with decent comprehension. It simply puts off people too lazy to put any effort into reading it. Im not going to argue this further.
     
  17. SoveSolin

    SoveSolin White Belt

    Joined:
    Dec 14, 2009
    Messages:
    76
    Likes Received:
    1
    Agreed. I think the English language has just degenerated so much that many people can't understand there's a difference between professional writing and the shit spewed out on text messages.

    Also, the article makes great points about scoring the takedown. This was one of my fears when Wanderlei fought Bisping. I'm sure there are other judges out there that would have scored a round or two in Bisping's favor based on the takedowns he scored. If a fighter manages to pop up immediately or if they utilize an effective guard and avoid damage or even threaten from his back then simply having top control shouldn't count for jack.
     
  18. HomerPlata

    HomerPlata Purple Belt

    Joined:
    May 12, 2010
    Messages:
    1,649
    Likes Received:
    1
    I would hope it's quite clear from the way I write that I don't have any problems with reading comprehension. The question of whether or not an article is a good read or not has nothing to do with the level of vocabulary used, or apparent intelligence displayed.

    When the message you are trying to get across becomes bogged down by the intricacy of your unnecessary waffle, you are not doing a good job, but feel free to keep acting like the only reason people think that article is shit is because they just don't understand.

    I get your side of the argument. I mean, why use one word when you can use fifty, right?
     
  19. nni

    nni Orange Belt

    Joined:
    May 10, 2010
    Messages:
    478
    Likes Received:
    0
    Location:
    New Orleans
    The article was perfectly readable. I like the main points raised by the article. Stalling and the value of a takedown in the context of winning a round should be re-evaluated.

    Stalling should be discouraged, be it either avoiding contact, wall and stall or lay and pray. I'm sure the rules will get stricter, with more warnings and standups for periods of inactivity. A few people will complain, but MMA will gain from it.

    Stealing a round with a takedown is the most bizarre concept for me. If you execute a takedown at the end of a round, it is essentially meaningless. You have no time to do anything with it.

    Stalling isn't permitted in most grappling competitions. Why should it be permitted in a competition that involves much more than grappling? If anything stalling rules should be stricter.
     
  20. nni

    nni Orange Belt

    Joined:
    May 10, 2010
    Messages:
    478
    Likes Received:
    0
    Location:
    New Orleans
    double post
     

Share This Page

  1. This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
    By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.