There have been many studies, and many articles written about the effectiveness of picking politicians at random rather than voting. Here is an example: https://www.theguardian.com/education/2012/apr/16/improbable-research-politicians-random-selection I for one would support a candidate chosen at random, (provided they met all qualifications) over either Clinton or Trump. Anyone else feel the same? Feel free to place whatever limits you like regarding the available pool of people in the lottery. We could limit it to congress, high IQ, college professors, CEOs, military brass, etc.