Im confused I could have sworn the result of the fight was overturned from a win to a no contest based off a failed PED test. I must be mistaken
it was and he was suspended for 15 months cause of it.
Im confused I could have sworn the result of the fight was overturned from a win to a no contest based off a failed PED test. I must be mistaken
Jones seem to have declined in the last few fights.
Would DC have enough in him to beat Jones if they fought now?
Or would this match play out like the first two?
I didn’t say that..
that he wasn't dosing steroids leading up to the dc fight. there's no way he was on a tbol protocol in the weeks before a fight. do you disagree with that? obviously the arbitrator saw the same thing as well.So what conclusion do you draw from the results you mention?
He doesn't cut much weight. He nearly died of kidney failure cutting weight for the olympics. Since then has has always cut very little weight.DC's only problem with fighting Jones is I believe the weight cut kills him too much. Heavyweight bout and history would also be written different
that he wasn't dosing steroids leading up to the dc fight. there's no way he was on a tbol protocol in the weeks before a fight. do you disagree with that? obviously the arbitrator saw the same thing as well.
why aren't you offering your own opinion? i asked you a question.If you think he didn't use them, then he was treated unfairly. Why strip him of the title if he didn't hold an unfair advantage?
why aren't you offering your own opinion? i asked you a question.
he was stripped because it was in his system, he had no good explanation and he hadn't served time for it before. period.
and he was.I claim no expertise in chemistry, so I can't offer an opinion on the merits of the case. I simply think he should be stripped and punished if he took something that could upset the balance of the fight but not otherwise.