Worst Decision since Bisping vs Hamill

Lewis won retard. He did more damage with the third round shots than was put on him all night. Do you really expect the judges to reward and advance a fighter to intended to stall the ENTIRE fight? Read the new rules: damage is the only consideration.
 
Why did Latifi get the third? Beast came closer to finishing.

lewis got ragdolled, taken down multiple times, controlled, pounded, missed a lot of shots and was hitting arms and shoulders all night.

Latifi 29-28 worst case scenario.
 
lewis got ragdolled, taken down multiple times, controlled, pounded, missed a lot of shots and was hitting arms and shoulders all night.

Latifi 29-28 worst case scenario.

disagree, Latifi gave the fight away.
 
The title proves how much you know about MMA. The 1st round in Bisping - Hamill was 10-9 Hamill. Remember, this was about 10 years ago and 10-8's weren't given out at all. Rounds 2 and 3 were razor close and legit could have gone either way. Hence, a 29-28 Bisping decision was perfectly acceptable. It's more an indictment of the 10 point must scoring system. Also, shit thread.
 
Yea can’t imagine what they were thinking . Lewis lost that fight
Or they didnt think those 1 second shitty scramble takedowns earned anymore points than Lewis landing 1 punch and cancelling those takedowns right out.... If a takedown leads to nothing i dont understand how people r instantly giving the round to the guy if there is no knockdown in that round... If you do nothing with that takedown that shit shouldnt even count... or count as much as 1 strike landed...

We need more judging like this to prevent people from trying to play the point game and not actually try to fight and compete.
 
You can disagree all you want bud, Lewis got ragdolled and lost convincingly. Hometown favorite and they gave him the win. Latifi 29-28.

lmao ok bud I will disagree. Beast won rd 1 and 3, easy.
 
Back
Top