world war 2 aircraft Debate. *update an restart*

GhostZ06

Steel Belt
@Steel
Joined
Aug 22, 2010
Messages
33,825
Reaction score
12,438
ok so we are gonna do this again an we are gonna talk about who had the best aircraft



1938-1945


No being bias crap or soviet humping since the warroom is the biggest soviet fangirl section, be fair, post fact an arguments and data


lost-ww2-fighter-plane-found-desert-egypt-flying_53830_600x450.jpg

lastpatrol.jpg

Air%20Combat%20Art%200144.jpg

433617_art_samolety_vtoraya-mirovaya_1920x1227_(www.GdeFon.ru).jpg

video%20games%20aircraft%20war%20ships%20battleship%20world%20war%20ii%20vehicles%201920x1080%20wallpaper_www.wallmay.com_42.jpg
 
Last edited:
Better for what? Escort missions, ground support, attacking shipping, CAPs?

The Spitfire is certainly the sexiest of the four you named.
 
punishment and durability defiantly goes to the p-40
 
Spitfire gets my vote. I could be wrong but I thought it had better performance across the board than the other planes listed. But I think P-40, Yak-1, and ME-109 are also cool looking planes.
 
Spitfire gets my vote. I could be wrong but I thought it had better performance across the board than the other planes listed. But I think P-40, Yak-1, and ME-109 are also cool looking planes.

Depends i think mark 2 had to deal with the me-109 F-4 which totally out gunned the spitfire considering the cannon's could rip up a spitfire.



if this thread does well, ill make a 2nd one with planes during D-day


im debating if i should sneak in the Lockheed P-38 Lightning since honestly the P-40 is meh
 
Last edited:
Spitfire by the sexi, P-40 was considered quite crappy if my ailing memory serves me.
 
I would have to go with the 109 if the pilot is good. The spitfire did improve throughout the war.



An interesting video of a German and British pilot making comparisons.

As for looks, I think the P-51 mustang is the nicest looking fighter in WW2
 
Spitfire was iconic, but short ranged. Me-109 had issues at lower altitude, but I still pick it over the ones you listed..
 
Spit was supposed to be more agile and better performing, and it also was more labor intensive to manufacture than ME-109.
 
Spitfire is the most beautiful fighter plane ever built. which one was better is really hard to tell, because there were a lot of factors involved.
 
Depends on the model and theatre of operations. The Me109 and Spitfire comparitive models were almost totally equal in terms of strengths and weaknesses. It really came down to raw pilot skill.

At low altitudes (MSL) the P40 variants were generally quite capable of handing both planes their asses.

Tossing the Yak 1 in? in reality these planes were so close to performance in one another that in a fight between equal pilots within each planes preferred environment, that the only distinguishing characteristic was which pilot had a better breakfast that day.
 
I can wrap my head around jets but could someone please ELI5 the physics of these airplanes?
 
Hands down, ME-109. Faster, higher flying, more well armed, flown by superior pilots (early WW2).

Later versions of the Spitfire was excellent. Could be a little correlation because the British fighting tactics improved later in the war also. Where as the Luftwaffe was already a seasoned force before the Battle of Britian ensued.

The P-40 was slow and early versions were easy picking for the Luftwaffe. For any comparison the P-40 won missions vs Japanese Zeros but struggled against the Luftwaffe (North Africa). The P-38 was the coolest looking plane in WW2 my opinion but it's fighting abilities may not have been better than the P-40. P-38 could go further than the P-40 and carry more payload making more ideal for the missions in the Pacific that were long flights and required dropping on Japanese fortifications.

The Yak was at first crudely built but pretty ingenious design. However the 109 was faster at altitude and was able to climb faster. Once again Luftwaffe capitalized on poorly trained pilots. Aces like Enrich Hartmann racked up over 200 kills on the eastern front.

In general German WW2 equipment was far superior to any of the allies war material. The gap was closed later in the war.
 
Hands down, ME-109. Faster, higher flying, more well armed, flown by superior pilots (early WW2).

Later versions of the Spitfire was excellent. Could be a little correlation because the British fighting tactics improved later in the war also. Where as the Luftwaffe was already a seasoned force before the Battle of Britian ensued.

The P-40 was slow and early versions were easy picking for the Luftwaffe. For any comparison the P-40 won missions vs Japanese Zeros but struggled against the Luftwaffe (North Africa). The P-38 was the coolest looking plane in WW2 my opinion but it's fighting abilities may not have been better than the P-40. P-38 could go further than the P-40 and carry more payload making more ideal for the missions in the Pacific that were long flights and required dropping on Japanese fortifications.

The Yak was at first crudely built but pretty ingenious design. However the 109 was faster at altitude and was able to climb faster. Once again Luftwaffe capitalized on poorly trained pilots. Aces like Enrich Hartmann racked up over 200 kills on the eastern front.

In general German WW2 equipment was far superior to any of the allies war material. The gap was closed later in the war.

112th squadron (squadron full of ace pilots like the flying tiger) did pretty well the with p-40s when they squad off with the 109s. And i think they were using the mark II p-40s ?
plus p-40 could take a lot of heat and punishment before it could be brought down. US planes where very strong and heavily armored. Not sturmovik armored but lol
 
Back
Top