"Man is born free; and everywhere he is in chains. One thinks himself the master of others, and still remains a greater slave than they."
- Jean-Jacques Rousseau, The Social Contract.
We do see female dominance (in some regards) in insect species, such as with ants/bees and their queens; we also see female insect species where the female is the “pitcher” <shudders>. However, unlike with insects, such as the ant (female ants do all the work), due to our advanced awareness and ability to process information, we can choose to respond to events in a myriad of different ways. An insect simply reacts to stimuli as though it were any other event. It receives signals from the general environment and reacts without any indication of conscious thought. Foragers are sent out, and if one finds food it leaves a pheromone trail for others to follow; it does this as a matter of function, not because it has a plan or some vision for colony prosperity. The same goes for the ants that catch the sent and form a trail. They’re all essentially acting on their own, but the emergent behavior makes it appear like intentional cooperation and problem solving.
Humans, on the other hand, can choose to focus the same kind of behaviors that insects display (e.g. aggression) in whichever manner they choose. We can channel aggressive behavior to serve us in different ways. We intentionally problem solve. We also have direct communication. We’re less restrained, albeit more burdened.
So, with that said, do you think that this difference in how we function is not a factor that could derail your theory in some manner? For instance, does the male’s superior aggression and readiness to procure territory, in the human animal, instill in him a greater ability for innovation and dominance than his female counterpart (while such behaviors remain necessary and prevalent)? And will this, in turn, be a limiting factor in the woman’s ability to usurp the human male?
That aside, one thing I’ve noticed is that there seems, to me, to be an effort, whether intentional or not, at a degree of homogenization. Perhaps that is a byproduct of the transitional stage of, as you say, the female effort to usurp the male, but I’m hesitant to draw any conclusions on both that and the validity of the initial observation itself. But a women trying to adopt male gender roles is a woman trying to be a man, not usurp his male status. The entire sex/gender controversy taking place now seems awfully strange to me and somewhat counter to what you're claiming is occurring.
So, in conclusion, I'm not sure what's happening is what you say is happening. But I'd be interested to hear more about your end times theory.
