Will the US under Biden recover some of the international standing it lost during Trump's tenure?

What specific measures that Trump implemented to advance the interests of American businesses (to the detriment of China) do you have in mind?

Lowering taxes for American businesses/businessmen, implemented tariffs on imports and vetoed new/prevented existing trading bills that give other countries favorable returns over their American partners. This is not necessarily just against China, but also Mexico and and other parts of Asia.
 
Absolutely. Trump was horrid for international relations, dude will go down like Reagan. Trump endorsing Erdogan and giving the border to Turkey and turning a blind eye to the brutal rape militias that are murdering children and gang raping Kurdish fighters before they torture and murder them?

I ain't no Biden fan, but I am a hella fan of the Kurdish struggle. Not only did Trump lie about keeping Turkey in line in Rojava, they started firebombing towns in Northern Iraq. Kurdish leaders BEFORE the double digit accused sexual predator was president praised Biden. Also the Iran deal was amazing.

People always talk about how the US murdered a high profile Iranian, but that bombing legit killed our own allies AND civilians. Also Trump vetoed a bill to stop funding the Yemeni genocide. Our tax dollars are literally being used to murder children, the school bus that blew all those children to shreds? US made, US provided. We did that.

Biden is going to be soft on Israel, but he was way harder on Saudi Arabia and Turkey. Plus we need to fucking make peace with Iran.

https%3A%2F%2Fcdn.cnn.com%2Fcnnnext%2Fdam%2Fassets%2F180810102214-12-yemen-schoolbus-airstrike-0809.jpg

Every American on this forum contributed to this. We all did this. We're all guilty.

Even the fucking Republicans voted to stop, but Trump loves them Saudis, so fuck them kids right?
 
Wrong, Obama lowered America's standing in the world by letting ISIS run wild, literally bowing down to world leaders, cozying up to Cuba and Iran, and failing to stand up to Russia. Obama was weak and is probably the least masculine President ever, he's not exactly the type of person to lead a global hegemon. The sharks around the world respect strength, nothing else.

Trump tried a different approach and it worked pretty well, I think.
Mind blowing. You are a retard
 
US never lost it. It only lost the fake ass kissing/ getting shit on.

Trump pushed them and called them out on their hypocrisy. He was the asshole who didn't give a fuck and they couldn't stand it. They prefer a chump that plays the lap dog.
 
Lowering taxes for American businesses/businessmen, implemented tariffs on imports and vetoed new/prevented existing trading bills that give other countries favorable returns over their American partners. This is not necessarily just against China, but also Mexico and and other parts of Asia.
95% of trumps tariffs were funneled right back to subsidies required to keep farmers alive. Trump royally fucked up the trade deal. Marginally lowering taxes for the middle class while drastically lowering taxes on the upper class while trying to strip Medicare, education funds is not net beneficial you dolt.
 
The answer is of course yes.

Simpletons think you create respect as a world leader by being an unstable, classless bully. So alpha!

All this does is of course to damage the US relation to important allies (simpletons also consistently underestimate the importance of solid alliances), while doing nothing to dissuade rogue leaders from taking advantage of America.

So yes, things can only get better.
 
From what I read, international consensus is Budden is senile and idiotic already but it seems to be seen as a good way to take advantage of the situation and get rid of protective laws Trump set to favor american economy.
 
95% of trumps tariffs were funneled right back to subsidies required to keep farmers alive. Trump royally fucked up the trade deal. Marginally lowering taxes for the middle class while drastically lowering taxes on the upper class while trying to strip Medicare, education funds is not net beneficial you dolt.

Trump def meant to have the US have the favorable sides of the deal. Thing is, there are so much players involved, the implementation was messed up. This is not necessarily Trump's fault, nor any other single person that could be POTUS. Also, "marginally lowering" has multiplier effects across a vast amount of people belonging in the middle class. You can't really dismiss it as ineffective.
 
Hello Beirut, Sanaa, Baghdad and Damascus
28_rouhini-(Read-Only).jpg
 
Last edited:
As an Australian it will be great to have someone with half a brain and an ability to keep to an agreement as our major ally.
 
I'm sure the rest of the world will be glad to have an american president that puts them first again.



This should really be the end of the thread.


It couldn’t be said more succinctly, and the fact that people are too stupid to realize this, is concerning.
 
The answer is of course yes.

Simpletons think you create respect as a world leader by being an unstable, classless bully. So alpha!

All this does is of course to damage the US relation to important allies (simpletons also consistently underestimate the importance of solid alliances), while doing nothing to dissuade rogue leaders from taking advantage of America.

So yes, things can only get better.

These people worshipped, for half a decade, a guy who once punched a music teacher in school because he didn't think they guy knew much about music.

That's their metric for how leaders are to perform. The rest of humanity looks at someone like that as a dangerous idiot.
 
Wrong, Obama lowered America's standing in the world by letting ISIS run wild, literally bowing down to world leaders, cozying up to Cuba and Iran, and failing to stand up to Russia. Obama was weak and is probably the least masculine President ever, he's not exactly the type of person to lead a global hegemon. The sharks around the world respect strength, nothing else.

Trump tried a different approach and it worked pretty well, I think.
Yeah I agree. Also it made the others look bad bending over and spreading it for China while he actually went after them.
Now we can all get back ignoring chianti and hope to gain access to their markets. I mean what's a little bit of genocide and aggressive posturing when we can make a cool billion, right?
 
Lowering taxes for American businesses/businessmen, implemented tariffs on imports and vetoed new/prevented existing trading bills that give other countries favorable returns over their American partners. This is not necessarily just against China, but also Mexico and and other parts of Asia.
From a purely economic point of view it seems the tariff increases (and retaliatory measures related to them) were a disaster:

"A study published in fall 2019 in the Journal of Economic Perspectives found that by December 2018, Trump's tariffs resulted in a reduction in aggregate U.S. real income of $1.4 billion per month in deadweight losses, and cost U.S. consumers an additional $3.2 billion per month in added tax.[24] The study's authors noted that these were conservative measures of the losses from the tariffs, because they did not take account of the tariffs' effects in reducing the variety of products available to consumers, or the tariff-related costs attributable to policy uncertainty or the fixed costs incurred by companies to reorganize their global supply chains.[24] A study by Federal Reserve Board economists found that the tariffs reduced employment in the American manufacturing sector.[189][190]

An April 2019 working paper by economists found that the tariffs on washing machines caused the prices of washers to increase by approximately twelve percent in the United States.[23] A 2019 paper by Federal Reserve Board economists found that the steel tariffs led to 0.6% fewer jobs in the manufacturing sector than would have happened in the absence of the tariffs; this amounted to approximately 75,000 jobs.[191][192]

In May 2019, analyses from varying organizations were released. A May 2019 Goldman Sachs analysis found that the consumer price index (CPI) for tariffed goods had increased dramatically, compared to a declining CPI for all other core goods.[193] A CNBC analysis that month found that Trump had "enacted tariffs equivalent to one of the largest tax increases in decades," while Tax Foundation and Tax Policy Center analyses found the tariffs could offset the benefits of the Tax Cuts and Jobs Act of 2017 for many households.[20][21][22] The Tax Foundation found that if all existing and proposed tariffs were fully implemented, the benefits of the Trump tax cut would be completely eliminated for all taxpayers through the 90th percentile in earnings.[194] Another May 2019 analysis conducted by the National Taxpayers Union warned that the existing and proposed additional tariffs, if fully implemented, would constitute the largest tax increase of the post-war era.[195] According to an analysis by Peterson Institute for International Economics economists, American businesses and consumers paid more than $900,000 a year for each job that was created or saved as a result of the Trump administration's tariffs on steel and aluminum.[196] The cost for each job saved as a result of the administration's tariffs on washing machines was $815,000.[196]

Analysis conducted by Deutsche Bank estimated that Trump's trade actions had resulted in foregone American stock market capitalization of $5 trillion through May 2019.[197]

Trump announced on August 1, 2019, that he would impose a 10% tariff on $300 billion of Chinese imports beginning September 1; four days later the Chinese Commerce Ministry announced that China was halting imports of all American agricultural goods. American Farm Bureau Federation data showed that agriculture exports to China fell from $19.5 billion in 2017 to $9.1 billion in 2018, a 53% decline.[198] The figure was $21.4 billion in 2016.[199]

A September 2019 Federal Reserve study found that tariffs Trump imposed through mid-2019, combined with the policy uncertainty they created, would reduce the 2020 real GDP growth rate by one percentage point.[200]

A study by four economists published in October 2019 by the Quarterly Journal of Economics estimated that U.S. consumers and firms who buy imports lost $51 billion (0.27% of GDP) as a result of the 2018 tariffs. After accounting for increases in government tariff revenue and gains to U.S. producers, the study authors estimated the aggregate U.S. real income loss to be $7.2 billion (0.04% of GDP).[25] The study found that "retaliatory tariffs resulted in a 9.9% decline in U.S. exports within products."[25] The study also found that workers in heavily Republican counties suffered the most from the trade war, because retaliatory tariffs focused on agricultural products.[25]

Between the time Trump took office in 2017 through March 2019, the U.S.'s trade deficit grew by $119 billion, reaching $621 billion, the highest it had been since 2008.[201] As of January 2020, the Trump administration had imposed tariffs on 16.8% of all goods imported into the U.S. (measured as a share of the value of all U.S. imports in 2017).[202] The Congressional Budget Office (CBO) published its estimate of the U.S. economic impact from Trump's trade policies:

In CBO's estimation, the trade barriers put in place by the United States and its trading partners between January 2018 and January 2020 would reduce real GDP over the projection period. The effects of those barriers on trade flows, prices, and output are projected to peak during the first half of 2020 and then begin to subside. Tariffs are expected to reduce the level of real GDP by roughly 0.5 percent and raise consumer prices by 0.5 percent in 2020. As a result, tariffs are also projected to reduce average real household income by $1,277 (in 2019 dollars) in 2020. CBO expects the effect of trade barriers on output and prices to diminish over time as businesses continue to adjust their supply chains in response to the changes in the international trading environment.[202]"
Source: http://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Trump_tariffs
 
Of course not, Biden and his family are dirty as they come, other leaders know they can be bought with a crack pipe and 10 years old girls.

Manlet detected. Dude he's 6 ft 3. Nobody cares about hands. You only care if you're a manlet or homo.

He lost, get over it
 
European governments will be happy to see Trump gone because he did like to play hardball and use America's powerful influence as a negotiation tool. Great for US economy but it was creating tensions with some European countries. I can't see anything changing too much but I can imagine Biden will want to be seen as behaving differently to Trump so that might be good for Europe. I'm interested to see if anything changes with regards to Europe's dealings with Russia. Will they continue to be chastised for doing business with America's economic rival?
Also will USA continue to interfere with elections overseas? In spite of their own election being an international disgrace this year will Biden's administration still feel they have a right to interfere with other countries elections?
 
I'm sure the rest of the world will be glad to have an american president that puts them first again.

Man, you guys really bought into Trump’s persona and didn’t pay any attention to how he was actually perceived and what actually occurred. I’m glad most Americans were paying attention to reality instead of rhetoric, and we won’t have to watch four more years of WWF style stupidity.
 
European governments will be happy to see Trump gone because he did like to play hardball and use America's powerful influence as a negotiation tool. Great for US economy but it was creating tensions with some European countries. I can't see anything changing too much but I can imagine Biden will want to be seen as behaving differently to Trump so that might be good for Europe. I'm interested to see if anything changes with regards to Europe's dealings with Russia. Will they continue to be chastised for doing business with America's economic rival?
Also will USA continue to interfere with elections overseas? In spite of their own election being an international disgrace this year will Biden's administration still feel they have a right to interfere with other countries elections?

What exactly did Trump extract from European countries that was good for the American economy?
 
Back
Top