Wikileaks Founder Promises More Hacked Hillary E-mails that Could Damage Her Campaign

When did proof start mattering?

Clinton spokesperson "Russians are working with Trump to influence the election"

Now that is the narrative by Hillary followers (including people in this thread that now require proof)

Great, so no proof. Moving on....
 
No, it's not. If Assange confirmed he was a Wikileaks whistleblower, then you would have a headline. But he didn't. So right now you just wish you had a headline. He evaded answering that line of questioning.

Is this common practice for Wikileakks?

http://www.businessinsider.com/wikileaks-20000-seth-rich-dnc-2016-8

The group WikiLeaks on Tuesday said that it is offering $20,000 for information leading to a conviction in the case involving the death of a former Democratic National Committee staffer earlier this year.
 

this is astounding... i dont think ive ever actually sick reading about politics before..
 
New interview with Assange aired 08-24 and 08-25

-Says there will be another leaked before the election and it will be significant

-Alludes to Seth Rich being a whistle-blower yet again and that they are interested in finding out about the murder. He basically says just because a whistle-blower is murdered in suspicious circumstances it doesn't necessarily mean that the two are connect

- Doesn't trust that MSNBC or the New York Times will report the leaks. Says it is sad how politicized media has become in the US

-About a Trump leak...He says it is hard to release anything worse about Trump than what he already says

2 parts to the interview



 
Huh? You know this thread is about Hillary, right, and not Trump? You just proved my point.
Every thread that has something negative about trump can guarantee to have 1 of these things brought up by anti Hillary people, Either Benghazi or Hillary emails. So stfu go bot.
 
I wouldn't expect any leaks to end Hillary's campaign. Her supporters have proven to be so void of any values, convictions, and even basic decency that she could literally do anything.

Hillary defenders are quite possibly the most pathetic group of americans to ever to exist.
 
I wouldn't expect any leaks to end Hillary's campaign. Her supporters have proven to be so void of any values, convictions, and even basic decency that she could literally do anything.

Hillary defenders are quite possibly the most pathetic group of americans to ever to exist.

Donald Trump is no saint, but compared to the Clintons, he is a jewel.
 
When did proof start mattering?

Clinton spokesperson "Russians are working with Trump to influence the election"

Now that is the narrative by Hillary followers (including people in this thread that now require proof)

Pretty much the narrative being pushed. It's designed to defuse any damaging information leaked. By painting the information as tainted from the messenger. It's designed to give the MSM media and staunch progressives a "mental block" that they can use to segregate their justified reasoning from their conflicted morality, even warp it.

The thing is, against any other candidate, Hillery would be in serious danger. But with Trump who does not care about appearances, she's almost a shoe in for the white house.

Trump is pure evil, or literally Hitler to progressives. So all the Clinton campaign needs to do to get the fools to vote for them instead is to play up, exaggerate his "bigotry" to give them their morality excuse.

These e-mail leaks could be damning to any other candidate at any other time. But right now. "nevertrump" is all that matters. Even most of the Berniebros have bought in.
 
Last edited:
Back
Top