Wikileaks Founder Promises More Hacked Hillary E-mails that Could Damage Her Campaign

Madmick said:
How much longer until he releases the new information?

I'm tempted to dump this thread because there's really no topic to discuss. The promise that he will release information isn't really a topic of discussion. It's a topic of speculation. This thread is a vacuum.
Click to expand...
But its cyclone force is sucking up twice as much as the leading brand!
 
Huh. I'm hoping to see some proof. He's stated his goal os to influence the election, but if all he does is spread wild innuendo without proof then he's indistinguishable from any cray asshole on Sherdog who calls Hillary a mass murderer.
 
JosephDredd said:
Huh. I'm hoping to see some proof. He's stated his goal os to influence the election, but if all he does is spread wild innuendo without proof then he's indistinguishable from any cray asshole on Sherdog who calls Hillary a mass murderer.
Click to expand...

Everything they have released has been pristine. No reason not to trust him
 
Russian whistleblowers to Wikileaks don't have to worry about risks, that's for sure, because they don't exist ;)

Assange is a Kremlin stooge.
 
Nobody care, this won't make news

Trump just told everyone to shoot Clinton in the head
 
DangDaGawd said:
Unless he has emails he can release to prove a connection, I don't really care about his speculation.
Click to expand...
This guy is really whoring himself out in the hopes Trump might free him.

So much for the white plume.
 
DangDaGawd said:
Except lack of any verifiable proof.
Click to expand...

When did proof start mattering?

Clinton spokesperson "Russians are working with Trump to influence the election"

Now that is the narrative by Hillary followers (including people in this thread that now require proof)
 
Overpressure said:
But its cyclone force is sucking up twice as much as the leading brand!
Click to expand...
Meh, we already have two other Wikileaks threads. I guess I'll merge because they appear to have new comments from him. I guess that is what will sustain this thread.

All of the talk about Wikileaks lately has been so speculative and based on the promise of new material that I can't tell what is supposed to be "new material" anymore. Even that first leak had a lot of old material being presented as "new". It was the Russian stuff that broke headlines with actual substance.
 
Madmick said:
Meh, we already have two other Wikileaks threads. I guess I'll merge because they appear to have new comments from him. I guess that is what will sustain this thread.
Click to expand...

Pretty big topic to bury. (Assange suggesting the murdered Seth was a whistleblower)

Why aren't you burying some of the the other topics?

I think this is big enough to warrant its own thread
 
Hans Gruber said:
When did proof start mattering?

Clinton spokesperson "Russians are working with Trump to influence the election"

Now that is the narrative by Hillary followers (including people in this thread that now require proof)
Click to expand...


This

Now the left thinks Putin is our greatest enemy, didn't need proof of that, just Obama's word
 
Tropodan said:
Wow. Probably the most intellectually dishonest statement in a while. "Underwhelming" lol.
Click to expand...
Sure about that?

Remind me of all the terrible damage it did to Hillary's campaign. Remember how it was going to end her? Instead, to rational people, it was a typically vicious response to an outsider challenging for leadership of a party. You think the RNC internals on Trump weren't twice as vicious?
 
Hans Gruber said:
Pretty big topic to bury.

Why aren't you burying some of the the other topics?
Click to expand...
Which topic? The part where Assange talks about Seth Rich, but won't even confirm if he was associated with Wikileaks? Does he have any evidence to link Rich's murder to political motivations? Or to substantiate that he was a "whistleblower"? I'm being pretty generous with a Snoped piece of bullshit:
http://www.snopes.com/seth-conrad-rich/

What else? The Abedine headline? Is that actually freshly released Wikileaks information? Because that's exactly what this thread promises. Notice the OP. It's about upcoming Wikileaks information Assange promised to release. So is this it? If it is, then it's exactly where it needs to be to make this threadworthy. So far all we have seen is an unfulfilled promise. We need something to discuss.
 
Madmick said:
Which topic? The part where Assange talks about Seth Rich, but won't even confirm if he was associated with Wikileaks? Does he have any evidence to link Rich's murder to political motivations? Or to substantiate that he was a "whistleblower"? I'm being pretty generous with a Snoped piece of bullshit:
http://www.snopes.com/seth-conrad-rich/

What else? The Abedine headline? Is that actually freshly released Wikileaks information? Because that's exactly what this thread promises. Notice the OP. It's about upcoming Wikileaks information Assange promised to release. So is this it? If it is, then it's exactly where it needs to be to make this threadworthy. So far all we have seen is an unfulfilled promise. We need something to discuss.
Click to expand...

Assange suggesting that Seth was a whistleblower is a pretty big topic. It is new information about a murder that is highly suspicious.

Are you going to combine all of the Trump talk about the 2nd amendment in the Presidential Election Thread? Of course not
 
Hans Gruber said:
Assange suggesting that Seth was a whistleblower is a pretty big topic. It is new information about a murder that is highly suspicious.

Are you going to combine all of the Trump talk about the 2nd amendment in the Presidential Election Thread? Of course not
Click to expand...
No, it's not. If Assange confirmed he was a Wikileaks whistleblower, then you would have a headline. But he didn't. So right now you just wish you had a headline. He evaded answering that line of questioning.
 
Hans Gruber said:
When did proof start mattering?

Clinton spokesperson "Russians are working with Trump to influence the election"

Now that is the narrative by Hillary followers (including people in this thread that now require proof)
Click to expand...

I've never said that. I require proof of that, too.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Latest posts

Forum statistics

Threads
1,236,624
Messages
55,431,170
Members
174,776
Latest member
kilgorevontrouty

Share this page

Back
Top