this is a stupid thread.
Experts did not "get it wrong".
Most play the odds.
Cain was caught multiple times by strikers (i.e. Cheick Kongo) and Junior was at the top of the food chain amongst the strikers.
"Experts" as you noted work with perception, previous encounters and what they "think" both fighters improved up until that fight.
Sam way as Cain improved his stricking, Junior could have improved his Cardio.
His TDD was great, and continued to be so (He defended a lot and when taken down came back up each time).
Obviously this is MMA. Anything can happen.
For you to treat like the first KO was a fluke shows how dumb you are and how stupidly biased is this thread.
"I had cain"
yeah, right. Everyone had. It is a wonder how Junior was ever the favorite.
I just can't understand how people leave in this wonderland, dreaming up facts they pull out of their ass to make up their own reality as owner of the truth.
This fight was determined by one punch. By a guy who is not a stricker.
Can he beat people stricking? sure. he did that before, but it is not his forte!
But to claim now that Junior does not have a chance against Cain is as stupid as people that claimed Cain didn't stand a chance against Junior!
Each fight is unique. Anything can happen, because one punch thrown can land and change the story of the fight.
It happened for Junior the first time, and it happened for Cain on the second encounter.
That does not make everyone wrong. Just proves that fighting business is unpredictable. That is it.