sohocanaan22
Blue Belt
- Joined
- Dec 6, 2013
- Messages
- 851
- Reaction score
- 0
There are lots of reasons...
That's for sure, but I think there is one very simple reason that overrides the rest. There is no legit, outside-perspective media coverage. Real journalists not only police whatever sport, they tell its stories--good and bad--and they foster the personalities that fans connect with on a deeper level than simply competition.
If Sports Illustrated or the NYTimes had someone on a consistent UFC beat we could count on in-depth features about the guys and their lives: What's going on with Cain the person while he keeps getting injured and sits out; What's Conor's full story, what drives him apart from a desire to be the best in the world, blah, blah, blah; Are rumors of JBJ's coke use true...in 2010. Provocative on-background news.
Dana's handling of the press is so rough, no serious publication will bother with more than an occasional piece on big pops like Rousey, and big WWE stars moving over...
I don't see how it can change as long as the UFC is promotional entity and not a governing body. As the head of a promotional company, Dana is probably doing the right thing for his bottom line when he bans reporters who piss him off, etc.