Why MEN are refusing to help WOMEN and CHILDREN

Lol, I'm assuming you've had pretty poor relationships with women.

You don't take a woman's words at face value, they're well beyond that. There is sub text and sub sub text that to a woman is plain speaking, if you approach it like you're talking to a dude you're going to be fucked.

No such thing. If you're excusing women for all kinds of double (and triple) entendre, then you're probably being conned and manipulated. Don't make things worse and tell her to clarify. What is a relationship worth when the other is speaking in alien symbols?
 
By every measure the USA has more immigrants than the UK. By a large margin, and a third to nearly half come from Europe.

You're just a useful idiot.

And the US is supposed to be a success story? Lol
 
In general, I've found that blue-collar working class types are more likely to help in these sorts of situations. They are also more likely to offer seats to the elderly and pregnant women.

City types DGAF and will pretend they haven't seen anything. I kind of get it with the violence as they may just not have seen it before in their sheltered lives, but not offering a seat to the elderly and pregnant is a piece of shit move.

I suspect part of the issue is that often these kinds of confrontations are hard to gauge whats going on, the victim might be very threatened but to bystanders it may appear like a heated argument and I think that's probably where class may come into it, the biggest divide by class is probably that middle and upper class are much more likely to be conservative in their interactions, getting into a shouting match with some mad bloke on a train isn't so much a sense of threat but of embarrassment.

As far as the original video goes I think what he highlights is actually that the media love to overplay these kinds of situations to create moral outrage, as noted the guy sent down for 6 years was actually on trial for various other crimes and the pensioner in London was not actually charged with murder.

A separate issue though is that the media are obsessed with paedophiles, more specifically with the idea of them snatching children on the street at random rather than abuse in families or institutions thats actually vastly more common. That has definitely created a climate of fear when it comes to people being potentially labelled as one for some harmless action such as helping a lost child.
 
Hilarious how far the pendulum swings with stuff like this.

"Ugh I am SO SICK of brute males assuming I need help with everything!"

"Ugh I am SO SICK of dumb white men NEVER HELPING ME!"

<45>

Keep shrieking, harpy, no one cares anymore.
 
In general, I've found that blue-collar working class types are more likely to help in these sorts of situations. They are also more likely to offer seats to the elderly and pregnant women.

City types DGAF and will pretend they haven't seen anything. I kind of get it with the violence as they may just not have seen it before in their sheltered lives, but not offering a seat to the elderly and pregnant is a piece of shit move.
I don't know if it's a morality issue but I think "white collars dudes" just aren't as comfortable being hands-on in these types of situations. If you work with your hands for a living or have a physical job, you probably have more confidence in your ability to handle yourself.

There is definitely a bystander effect in play though, I think if one suit guy tried to intervene more would follow, but in the city people are predisposed to mind their own business.
 
Because they are 'pussies'. That is not true of all men. Come pull that shit here in the Southern U.S. - 'Red Neck Country' - and have your ass handed to you. I see that 'shit' happen in front of me, I'm not standing by watching. Only 'pussies' beat on women and children. They don't beat on other men because they know they are going to get a real 'whipping'. Yeah, bring all the 'legal' stuff you want. I have a great attorney that always gets me out of trouble with a 'defensive' legal argument.

Have all London men turned to 'pussies'? Time to grow some 'balls' back. Come visit us in Oklahoma and Texas to get your manhood back. ;)
55f859fb1a000028007f3d39.jpeg

DomesticViolenceMAP6.png

https://www.forbes.com/pictures/lml45jfem/no-8-lawton-oklahoma/#3581209b27c8

What were you saying?
 
Last edited:
No such thing. If you're excusing women for all kinds of double (and triple) entendre, then you're probably being conned and manipulated. Don't make things worse and tell her to clarify. What is a relationship worth when the other is speaking in alien symbols?

Understand the game and then you can play it. Or go full autism and never find happiness. It's about understanding the language that the objects of your desire speak, not about acting like a retard.


And the US is supposed to be a success story? Lol

US economy is doing pretty well last time I heard, but my point wasn't about whether the UK or the US were doing well relative to each other. I was pointing out the hypocrisy of the quoted post. That's another, very simple subtext you missed. Perhaps you need classes? Maybe just socialise more.
 
Why is he wearing a beanie indoors? I bet it's because hes bald or balding and is embarrassed by it.

Anyway im not watching that long ass video thats probably some incel type shit.
 
Lol, I'm assuming you've had pretty poor relationships with women.

You don't take a woman's words at face value, they're well beyond that. There is sub text and sub sub text that to a woman is plain speaking, if you approach it like you're talking to a dude you're going to be fucked.

That's a poor assumption all around to be honest. I think it's more than likely you're the one whom has issues with women talking about you cacn't take a womans words at face value. Do you believe them to be so gullible / naive / etc that you have to "mansplain" for them? Get out of here with this silly BS.
 
{<jordan}

Please tell me you don't actually believe this.

Did you see the woman...did you read the article? Race of every single person involved is mentioned with the exception of the attacker. Do you feel like that was on purpose or an oversight? Also, the woman is mad at the "50+ year old white dudes" but not the "mentally disturbed" guy who chased her and kicked her. Not to mention the "Eastern European Guy" who was supposedly coming down the stairs to help her. She's a full on 100% SJW liberal feminist hipster douche.

Again, I did explicitly state that what I had suggested was supposition.
 
Some cliffs would be help... Kind of fucked up to be a red belt and still think posters are going to sit and watch some random dork babble about something for 13 minutes straight


So I skimmed through it. This woman doesn’t mentioned the colour of her stacker but makes sure to absolutely point out that the men who didn’t help her were “2 middle class white men” and that she blames them more than her stacker. And this is from London right? Why would she not mention the attackers Color but made sure to say that these “white guys” are cowards for not helping.

So was he a Muslim migrant from Somalia or Afghanistan? Maybe they knew If they tried to subdue this man they would instantly be all over the media painted as “racists” for attacking an innocent Muslim man. In a cucked out joke of a place like London it’s not surprising at all they didn’t bother helping. I didn’t watch the whole video but I can get the idea pretty easily, and this woman also seems to have some sort of agenda to try and paint all white guys as cowards or something. Who the fuck knows. But if turned out this attacker was a Muslim migrant and these 2 “white middle class men” ended up going after him to protect her and roughed him up a bit, they would absolutely be crucified and Likely get serious prison time. And I wouldn’t doubt that this bitch would also take her attackers side, And just claim these 2 guys were racist predators that went way too far. She seems fucked up and clearly has an agenda against white men.

Same in Canada. Most people don’t want to intervene because they often are the ones that get charged for a crime.
I only felt watching the beginning was necessary bro. Sorry, I'll specify next time.
 
Understand the game and then you can play it. Or go full autism and never find happiness. It's about understanding the language that the objects of your desire speak, not about acting like a retard.

You must be very happy having to constantly walk on eggs because the object of your dreams can't speak fucking english, and must lay traps after every second word


US economy is doing pretty well last time I heard, but my point wasn't about whether the UK or the US were doing well relative to each other. I was pointing out the hypocrisy of the quoted post. That's another, very simple subtext you missed. Perhaps you need classes? Maybe just socialise more.

When there is a rise of lawless regions, you know your homeland is on the road to success!

 
Why is he wearing a beanie indoors? I bet it's because hes bald or balding and is embarrassed by it.

Anyway im not watching that long ass video thats probably some incel type shit.
The guy is definitely not a fan of incels. Made a point in another video about how if women are out earning in wages, and outperforming men in college, it is up to guys to step up. Not be resentful little bitches. Seems opposite of whiney incel fuckbois
 
Hilarious how far the pendulum swings with stuff like this.

"Ugh I am SO SICK of brute males assuming I need help with everything!"

"Ugh I am SO SICK of dumb white men NEVER HELPING ME!"

<45>

Keep shrieking, harpy, no one cares anymore.
and bingo, hypocrite bitches have no idea why they do what they do
 
Did you see the woman...did you read the article? Race of every single person involved is mentioned with the exception of the attacker. Do you feel like that was on purpose or an oversight? Also, the woman is mad at the "50+ year old white dudes" but not the "mentally disturbed" guy who chased her and kicked her. Not to mention the "Eastern European Guy" who was supposedly coming down the stairs to help her. She's a full on 100% SJW liberal feminist hipster douche.

Again, I did explicitly state that what I had suggested was supposition.

Did YOU read the article?

https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/ar...middle-class-men-left-attacked-busy-Tube.html

She says the attacker was of "south-east Asian descent". I'm not rewatching the vid, but maybe the Youtuber left that out intentionally? Maybe to rile certain types up?

She's white and middle class herself, so maybe she was shocked that her own didn't help her?
 
Last edited:
I’m not fucking watching that because I don’t care. But from what I gather by reading the posts, you are all just proving the very point the video was making.
 
Its hard to say considering the way she injected race into the situation.

It's odd that she pointed out that they were white and middle class, but she mentioned everyone else's race too. Like I said above, she's white middle class, so maybe she expected more from her people?

I've seen the same when black women have been attacked and the victims and people in comments have pointed out that black men that were around didn't help them.

Just feels like some white bros are looking to be offended and always feeling like they're being attacked/defamed/slandered by the media and the public when really everyone is being attacked if you look in the right places.
 
It's odd that she pointed out that they were white and middle class, but she mentioned everyone else's race too. Like I said above, she's white middle class, so maybe she expected more from her people?

I've seen the same when black women have been attacked and the victims and people in comments have pointed out that black men that were around didn't help them.

Just feels like some white bros are looking to be offended and always feeling like they're being attacked/defamed/slandered by the media and the public when really everyone is being attacked if you look in the right places.
Well, I'm not white, so I'm not criticizing this because it implicates me or anything. I have seen liberal women trash white men for being white, and I doubt it is because they have some group identity or notions of racial solidarity.
 
Well, I'm not white, so I'm not criticizing this because it implicates me or anything. I have seen liberal women trash white men for being white, and I doubt it is because they have some group identity or notions of racial solidarity.
White women think they are the arbiters morality and justice. Considering all their own faults, that shit is laughable.
 
Back
Top