Because "muh P4P list" to make the smaller people feel included even though bigger fighters are objectively better fighters in general
I didn't think it was.....even Jon and DJ agree on this.DJ lost to Cruz and Pickett.. Jones never lost and beat better guys.. why is this even an argument?
DJ lost to Cruz and Pickett.. Jones never lost and beat better guys.. why is this even an argument?
Because "muh P4P list" to make the smaller people feel included even though bigger fighters are objectively better fighters in general
DJ is undefeated in his weight class just like Jones. If Jones fights at HW and still remains undefeated then I will agree with your assessment.
How are they better fighters in general? Is Mark Hunt more skilled than DJ?
jones beat nothing but past their prime fighters like shogun,rampage,machida,vitor
jones wins look better on paper
Because "muh P4P list" to make the smaller people feel included even though bigger fighters are objectively better fighters in general
I don't agree. Talent for talent size has no bearing. Now obviously if you put a guy like Demetrius against Jones it's a no brainer and that's when size plays it's role. If you were someway able to make Demetrius the same size as Jones though that might be different altogether because he is vastly talented.
Well, when we get a way to do that, I will submit to you that DJ is better than Jones
I understand the many reasons for people to hate Jones but he has beaten every challenger. Who should he have fought in place of all those fighters?jones beat nothing but past their prime fighters like shogun,rampage,machida,vitor
jones wins look better on paper
DJ lost to Cruz and Pickett.. Jones never lost and beat better guys.. why is this even an argument?