- Joined
- Jan 23, 2006
- Messages
- 19,109
- Reaction score
- 12,469
Meanwhile, in reality, democrats were raging at Comey for investigating Hillary, then he tucked tail and said it wasn't really an investigation so much as a "matter", then said she clearly committed crimes but had no interest in pursuing charges to appease "the party" and didn't want to be in the dog house with his pussy hat wearing wife.
He then got fired for telling Trump in person that he was not the target of their partisan investigation, but refusing to say that in public because he was scared of the democrats.
Nobody "celebrated" his appointment of Wray, and just lol at "partisan appointments" in DC, where Trump got a total of 12,000 votes in 2016. FFS, Walter Mondale won DC by 75 points, yet you're imagining this giant pool of defiant republicans ready to trash their career.
Yes, raiding the home of the last president and front runner for the next nomination's house for outdated, several year old clerical records that they already have copies and records of is pretty goddamn far from normal or sane.
So the answer is that you don't see how your argument is a non-sequitur. Got it. You choose to believe that Wray is in the Democrats' pocket and is used by the federal government to go after Trump because..... (???)
You Trumpers can't stick to any singular logic. Your logic adapts to your emotions rather than actual reasoning.