Why is UFC worker Rogan allowed to count Jones fight against Cormier as a win when it's ruled a NC?

Sure, but I think it is safe to say that DC will never be competitive with Jones, and it was a dominant victory, so in most contexts, it is fair to call it a win, even if it is a "no contest on paper".

It was also concluded that Jones didn't take it on purpose, so the amounts were probably not very significant. In a law suit, they would probably have reversed it and called it a win, but for Jones that would have cost a lot of money and time, with an uncertain outcome..
It's hard to believe anyone buys the tainted dick pill story.
 
Because it was a win.
tenor.gif

This can't be changed. Cry is free.
 
He needed steroids to beat DC so that win doesn’t count. He had an advantage and was still losing before he got the KO lol.

Rogans favorite fighter is Jones so of course he’s biased.
 
It's hard to believe anyone buys the tainted dick pill story.
Conte has said that both guys have had suspicious T-levels, and I never believed in clean guys on the top of the bigges org, but since TS is so into the technicalities, he sure should consider this too. Jones was "proven innocent" in this case.
 
Back
Top