Art Vandelay
Latex Salesman
- Joined
- Jan 7, 2006
- Messages
- 4,179
- Reaction score
- 0
If it's $20 for a trial month with no obligation, you should definitely do it. If you can't spare the time, I'm sure other qualified individuals you know can.
If it's $20 for a trial month with no obligation, you should definitely do it. If you can't spare the time, I'm sure other qualified individuals you know can.
Technically there are leg locks in Judo.
I know I'm going to catch hell for this but......
The only difference between Judo and BJJ are the rules and strategy. The basic techniques are the same, each has just evolved differently.
There I've said it. Now I'll be hated by both sides.
Aikido when done the way the grand masters teach it still doesn't work and shouldnt be compared with bjj.
You know, that's actually a good question.
I don't consider that the martial art necessarily has to be "style x, style y, or style z" just that it works. Look at Machida. If Machida, tommorow, opened up an MMA academy where he taught karate and jiu jitsu, as well at the blended applications for MMA, that's MMA. It's something effective and mixed together in application. Same thing if I were to open up a school that used judo, sambo, and Sanda for its MMA base. If it works together, it's MMA because it's effective and mixed.
If it's an arbitrary throwing together of martial arts, like JJJ, aikido, and Kuk Soo Won, and they're not integrated, then it's not MMA, it's just three martial arts.
At least, that's my opinion.
Aikido when done the way the grand masters teach it is far superior to bjj.
if you think thats bad, check this:
http://blog.myspace.com/index.cfm?fuseaction=blog.ListAll&friendID=325236823
www.masterwaki.com
hmm..ok..so let say.i'm a black belt in taekwondo and also black belt in judo.i blend both martial art and cut out the katas.theorically it might be effective system.and i teach it in a mma school but i still emphasise tt its a blend of taekwondo and judo.so will it still be a legit mma system?