- Joined
- Mar 7, 2006
- Messages
- 7,536
- Reaction score
- 113
Sadly this. Lets all hope for the sake of good he gets destroyed by DC.Because $$$
Sadly this. Lets all hope for the sake of good he gets destroyed by DC.Because $$$
no, there was no fine from usada. any fine is due to the nevada state commission
and there was no "deal".. one year was the maximum, he got slapped with the maximum
He made a deal with USADA for 250k fine and 1 year of suspension.. he is currently serving that time and has payed or will pay the fine.
no, there was no fine from usada. any fine is due to the nevada state commission
and there was no "deal".. one year was the maximum, he got slapped with the maximum
They literally hid the test from people and he failed and had to pay a fine but he didnt even have to make a public appearance or address or talkabout his test faliure..best yet he gets an immediate title shot..wtf
Jones on the other hand had to make a press conference, he had to fight OSP before a title shot and constantly gets bashed for it..
NSAC suspended him 1 year and fined him $250k. source.
USADA also gave him a 1 year suspension. source.
but i thought USADA suspensions only counted while the fighter is in the testing pool? so wouldn't his 1 year suspension (11 months and change, actually) start last week? @dimspace
Pursuant to the UFC Anti-Doping Policy, all UFC athletes serving a period of ineligibility for an anti-doping policy violation are required to remain in the USADA registered testing pool and make themselves available for testing in order to receive credit for time served under his or her sanction. Furthermore, if an athlete retires during his or her period of ineligibility, the athlete's sanction will be tolled until such time the athlete notifies USADA of his or her return from retirement and once again makes him or herself available for no-advance-notice, out-of-competition testing.so the fight is next summer?
We got no solid date.
Speculation is he needs to do 6 months in USADA and he is done so that's like the first week or the second week of January.. he should be okay for the Super Bowl card in February.
I'm still half ass waiting for a surprise factor that he entered earlier and we get him in the end of the year like New Years Eve card or something, my wild theory.
I'm curious what "in time" means. I find it unlikely tho that no one knew the sample was positive for PEDs prior to July 9th.as of March 2018:
"a drug sample that was collected on June 28th (the results didn’t come back in time to remove Lesnar from his July 9th bout with Mark Hunt at UFC 200) as well as a positive sample coming back from his post-fight drug test the night of the bout."
I'm curious what "in time" means. I find it unlikely tho that no one knew the sample was positive for PEDs prior to July 9th.
all returning fighters have to be in the pool for 6 months. Brock slipped through a loophole the first time because although he was a 'returning' fighter, he left pre-USADA, and that allowed UFC to grant him a pass. not so this time (i think this is right. i could be wrong. i haven't thought about it in 2 years and my memory ain't what it used to be. if i'm wrong i'm sure someone will come correct me.)Also, wouldn't Brock have to undergo testing over a period of time leading up to a return to action?
Just look at what the typical turn around on their testing results are. Usually when a fighter tests positive following a fight, the news breaks within a few days.that's the claim. you're not the first to be skeptical that it takes longer than 10 days to run do the myriad of tests they run.
i can find dozens of counter examples of what you just said. can you provide me two examples of a positive test breaking 'within a few days'? thanks.Just look at what the typical turn around on their testing results are. Usually when a fighter tests positive following a fight, the news breaks within a few days.
NSAC suspended him 1 year and fined him $250k. source.
USADA also gave him a 1 year suspension. source.
but i thought USADA suspensions only counted while the fighter is in the testing pool? so wouldn't his 1 year suspension (11 months and change, actually) start last week? @dimspace
Pursuant to the UFC Anti-Doping Policy, all UFC athletes serving a period of ineligibility for an anti-doping policy violation are required to remain in the USADA registered testing pool and make themselves available for testing in order to receive credit for time served under his or her sanction. Furthermore, if an athlete retires during his or her period of ineligibility, the athlete's sanction will be tolled until such time the athlete notifies USADA of his or her return from retirement and once again makes him or herself available for no-advance-notice, out-of-competition testing.so the fight is next summer?
Just look at what the typical turn around on their testing results are. Usually when a fighter tests positive following a fight, the news breaks within a few days.
i can find dozens of counter examples of what you just said. can you provide me two examples of a positive test breaking 'within a few days'? thanks.