- Joined
- Jul 2, 2013
- Messages
- 4,376
- Reaction score
- 264
Or are they just risk takers if they had their way?
I don't know what the deal with Bolton is, but Haley is an opportunist who is sucking up to the Neocons, cause she wants to be the GOP president in the next election, or the one after.Or are they just risk takers if they had their way?
The consequences the Russians promised- there was a spike in the amount of Russian internet trolls after the strikes.There's not going to be a nuclear war over this so stop menstrating
Well, Bolton just wants to see the mushroom cloud, the rest I’m sure have various motivations.
Only the best people, homie, none of those swamp shits, yeah?
It’s not that I have a huge problem with Bolton. It’s just I think rather than pay his salary, you could just put a sticky note in front an empty chair that says
“Bomb them”
And you’d arrive at the same result.
What's long term?1. Take a deep breathe TS. No one wants a nuclear war and there isn't going to be one
2. I don't want to be involved long term in Syria at all. There is no vital US interest at stake and no side worth supporting. But I have no problem with limited airstrikes when chemical weapons are being used to to create a disincentive to use them. I have no inherent problem with being temporarily against the side that uses sarin on civilians.
3. So to me the issue is how this all plays out. Is it a short term reaction or are we fully committing to the Syrian war?