- Joined
- May 7, 2025
- Messages
- 378
- Reaction score
- 174
Why does fighters from wrestling background are more sought after in mma compared to other athletes from different discipline?
Why does fighters from wrestling background are more sought after in mma compared to other athletes from different discipline?
UFC rules favor Wrestlers... Pride , One, PFL don't let you lay on top of a guy for 4:50 before telling you to improve your position...
What MMA promotion favors strikers in terms of ruleset?Wrestlers more often than not have an advantage when it's actually MMA and not made up specific rules to favor the strikers.
So I guess that's one thing (if true) the UFC does right.
Because they fight bare chested. Its tailor made for wrestlersWhy does fighters from wrestling background are more sought after in mma compared to other athletes from different discipline?
This is misinformation. Stop being stupidUFC rules favor Wrestlers... Pride , One, PFL don't let you lay on top of a guy for 4:50 before telling you to improve your position...
Ruleset favors wrestling. Wrestling allows someone to dictate where the fight ends up at.
Not reallyi think because it's harder to land a KO punch than it is to get ahold of someone and drag them down to the mat.
I dont get it sherbro, should fights begin on ground? Even in wrestling fights begin stand up no? Begining of the fight is really no mans land, you got to take yours.I gotta disagree..
1) Every fight starts standing, which means. Every round starts in the strikers realm theres never a round where wrestlers get to start in their realm.
2)Modern day fighters are well aware of wrestling unlike some fighters back in Pride FC days and it is much harder to take people down now, where as striking has always been effective, a flush shot to the chin is always gunna be effective not every takedown attempt is, although this is not a rule, my point is grappling is the much tougher aspect of MMA, so when a fighter does complete a takedown they should be given time to work on the ground or wear their Opponents down through control because there are no rules that force strikers to have to start on the floor ever or be reset on the ground when they are being timid or playing paddy cake with their strikes...while avoiding all grappling attempts or stifling the chances of progress grappling wise through "running tactics" ( i dont think theres a problem with movement to win fights im just pointing out the lack of penalty to do so when grapplers are penalized for "stalling")
I think the rules are set pretty even ...if not tilted slightly for strikers
This is misinformation. Stop being stupid