1. Guest, The MS Paint Shoop Thread v5 is up! Red Block» | Blue Block»

Why do we talk about "size differences" when weight classes exist?

Discussion in 'UFC Discussion' started by Defeat Unknown, Aug 4, 2018.

  1. Defeat Unknown Silver Belt

    Joined:
    Jul 7, 2013
    Messages:
    10,294
    Likes Received:
    22
    Among analysts, "he's the bigger fighter" and "the size is going to make a big difference in this fight" seems to be a common talking point when predicting/analyzing fights these days.

    When weight classes exist, why is this such a significant factor in fights? What is the point of having weight classes if we so frequently see, come fight night, that one fighter is significantly larger than their opponent?

    If size is a determining factor when it comes to fights, perhaps the existing weight classes are too large and allow too much allowance in weight disparity.

    Nothing is proven if at the end of the fight, the winner boasts "I was the bigger fighter" and, if the loser also says "he was the bigger fighter".

     
  2. Lando Banned Banned

    Joined:
    May 31, 2018
    Messages:
    1,389
    Likes Received:
    0
    Some fighters frames are better suited to cutting more weight. More weight classes wouldn't do shit.

    It's not even a problem anyway so who cares
     
  3. Jdanois Blue Belt

    Joined:
    Jul 30, 2017
    Messages:
    684
    Likes Received:
    34
    Yes. When I saw the difference is size between Holland and Santos, I couldn't believe they were in the same weight class!
     
  4. linvillegorge Silver Belt

    Joined:
    Apr 6, 2009
    Messages:
    12,250
    Likes Received:
    1,201
    Location:
    CO
    The difference between weight classes is pretty large, especially compared to boxing.

    Weight classes decrease the disparity between the sizes of combatants, they don't eliminate it. There are always going to be big weight cutters and there's always going to be guys who cut less weight. The big gap in weight classes in MMA just exacerbates that. The element of grappling does as well. Size advantage means a lot more in grappling than it does in a pure striking contest.
     
  5. Noleggeisha Brown Belt

    Joined:
    Apr 4, 2011
    Messages:
    2,667
    Likes Received:
    86
    Right? Cub vs Moicano too.
     
  6. I WILL CUT YOU Calamity from the Heavens Platinum Member

    Joined:
    Feb 4, 2015
    Messages:
    12,868
    Likes Received:
    1,228
    Location:
    Osotogari City
    Because your mother cuts to Super Heavyweight Trebek

    [​IMG]
     
  7. RetiredSlave Red Belt

    Joined:
    Oct 30, 2015
    Messages:
    8,439
    Likes Received:
    554
  8. jjthenextchamp1 Purple Belt

    Joined:
    Jan 8, 2011
    Messages:
    1,596
    Likes Received:
    4
    Royce and Floyd already proved that skills pays the bills. But if all things are equal and you're smaller you're sol because the bigger guy can lay on you and you won't be able to get up.
     
  9. Defeat Unknown Silver Belt

    Joined:
    Jul 7, 2013
    Messages:
    10,294
    Likes Received:
    22
    Except it is a problem and has a direct outcome on lots of fights.

    When Till brags about being a LHW fighting WWs, and he's noticeably larger than Wonderboy in the cage, and when Wonderboy moves forward into Till and Till seems uneffected, then yes, size differences are a problem. If a much larger fighter defeats a smaller fighter, it doesn't determine who the better fighter is but rather only determines that the bigger fighter won. We already know size makes a difference, which is why we have weight classes to begin with, so when someone can bypass weight classes by cutting 30 pounds, versus his opponent cutting 10 pounds, it's all really fucking pointless and stupid and nonsensical.
     
  10. NotoriousMillions 28-1

    Joined:
    Aug 7, 2016
    Messages:
    14,310
    Likes Received:
    0
    Location:
    Hater's Heads
    Because of how MMA is. Big jumps in weight classes, no weight cutting limits, etc. There is also no division below 125. MM is smaller than everyone. He's realistically a 115er that's good enough to dominate 125ers.

    Just one of many reasons boxing is more refined.
     
  11. j18lee Brown Belt

    Joined:
    Jul 19, 2008
    Messages:
    3,665
    Likes Received:
    89
    We talk about size differences because Anthony Johnson vs. Charlie Brenneman.

    [​IMG]
     
  12. SuperNerd Off Season Mode.

    Joined:
    Nov 8, 2005
    Messages:
    55,950
    Likes Received:
    744
    TS trying to show he's an independent thinker and a rebel.

    He should use the community, the internet, his school, the gym and all it's advantages imo.
     
  13. The Half Blood Prince Purple Belt

    Joined:
    Apr 24, 2017
    Messages:
    1,913
    Likes Received:
    293
    Location:
    Australia
    Why do you think size matters more in grappling than striking?

    Once the fight hits the ground, this is where size matters the least in a fight. This is why BJJ was so popular and revolutionised MMA into what it is today, because it allowed a smaller weaker man to beat a bigger stronger person, and this was only achieved on the ground. On the ground your power matters less because you have very limited space to make use of your power.

    Standing up size matters more so because the bigger you are the more harder your punches are, and the easier it is to absorb strikes.
     
  14. Jackonfire BMF Mod Staff Member Senior Moderator

    Joined:
    Jun 14, 2009
    Messages:
    52,121
    Likes Received:
    9,602
    Location:
    The Mother Ship
    Is this a serious question?
     
  15. linvillegorge Silver Belt

    Joined:
    Apr 6, 2009
    Messages:
    12,250
    Likes Received:
    1,201
    Location:
    CO
    You've never actually grappled, have you?
     
  16. The Half Blood Prince Purple Belt

    Joined:
    Apr 24, 2017
    Messages:
    1,913
    Likes Received:
    293
    Location:
    Australia
    I do BJJ and have wrestled, hbu
     
  17. linvillegorge Silver Belt

    Joined:
    Apr 6, 2009
    Messages:
    12,250
    Likes Received:
    1,201
    Location:
    CO
    I honestly don't believe you if you actually think that a size/weight advantage isn't a huge factor in grappling if the skillsets are similar.
     
  18. The Domin8or Banned Banned

    Joined:
    Jun 23, 2018
    Messages:
    1,235
    Likes Received:
    0
    Location:
    The Nerdbashing State of Chaos Nation
    What about when 168 pound Colin Mcgregor fought 510 pounds Nathan Diaz ?
     
  19. Lando Banned Banned

    Joined:
    May 31, 2018
    Messages:
    1,389
    Likes Received:
    0
    Its not a "problem", it's an advantage. Till can cut more weight than other fighters due to either his body type or some scientific knowledge he's gained. It's like saying it's unfair because Tyrone Woodley is naturally more explosive and powerful than Carlos Condit. It's not a problem, it's a natural advantage, which has drawbacks.
     
  20. The Half Blood Prince Purple Belt

    Joined:
    Apr 24, 2017
    Messages:
    1,913
    Likes Received:
    293
    Location:
    Australia
    That's not what I said. I said size advantage matters less on the ground than it does standing up....
    You don't even have to train to know that, you just have to look at the history of BJJ and how the UFC started

    And I wasn't talking in the context of a similar skill set exactly. Obviously if both fighters are of similar skill than the bigger guy wins majority of the time
     

Share This Page

  1. This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
    By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.