It’s so funny to think like 5 years later, Anderson at like 44 could smash Weidman.
I don't find the first one flukey, part of what made Anderson great was his dodging and elusiveness. How he just barely slips out of reach and then returns fire. That style eventually gets hit, it's not a fluke, but the nature of the beast. Anderson's legend is built on it, it can't be used as an excuse while used to enshrine him. It's got to be looked at equally. He wasn't lucky to slip Forrest and he wasn't unlucky to not slip Weidman. Whether you agree, I hope you can see my point.Chris was in his pre-USADA state (both bigger and faster) combined with the fact that they were pretty fluky KO's.
If they weren't fluky ... then show Weidman's other KO's that came in similar fashion? What? He never broke anyone else's leg with a check? I wonder why not?
PS Weidman WON both times fair and square just like how Serra won against GSP fair and square.
That doesn't mean they weren't fluky and they are not likely to happen again.
No, that was a totally different set of circumstances. They were both left hooks, but that’s about all they had in common.weidman dropped Uriah hall the exact same way.
There’s an obvious problem comparing Gsp/Serra and weidman/Silva. Anyone can get caught, yes, and that’s what we saw with Serra and gsp. The only way Serra was winning was exactly what happened. Objectively speaking, weidman was clearly handling Silva in both fights, and I believe he was favored to win anyway.Chris was in his pre-USADA state (both bigger and faster) combined with the fact that they were pretty fluky KO's.
If they weren't fluky ... then show Weidman's other KO's that came in similar fashion? What? He never broke anyone else's leg with a check? I wonder why not?
PS Weidman WON both times fair and square just like how Serra won against GSP fair and square.
That doesn't mean they weren't fluky and they are not likely to happen again.
Anderson was favored for win, although the lines were decently close for a Silva fight.There’s an obvious problem comparing Gsp/Serra and weidman/Silva. Anyone can get caught, yes, and that’s what we saw with Serra and gsp. The only way Serra was winning was exactly what happened. Objectively speaking, weidman was clearly handling Silva in both fights, and I believe he was favored to win anyway.
Do the fights end like those 2 if they fought 10 more times? Maybe not, but weidman would still win those fights too. The second fight wasn’t close at all and he nearly scored a KO early on in that one as well. There is nothing flukey about pre usada weidman dominating/finishing Silva.
The problem is Silva fans use the unusual finishes of the two fights with weidman as fuel to delegitimize the fact that Weidman was far better at the time they squared off. Of course silva wouldn’t break his leg again, but he was getting his ass kicked and that wasn’t going to change.
Fair enough.Anderson was favored for win, although the lines were decently close for a Silva fight.
View attachment 721947
Silva was winning the first fight easy. Weidman already had his mouth wide open before the lucky knock out.lol those fights were so funny.
anderson wasnt even competitive in them for a second.
lol no silva wasnt.Silva was winning the first fight easy. Weidman already had his mouth wide open before the lucky knock out.
You’re kidding?Silva was winning the first fight easy. Weidman already had his mouth wide open before the lucky knock out.
Silva was winning the first fight easy. Weidman already had his mouth wide open before the lucky knock out.