Why are there no conjoined MMA fighters?

RobboMarciano

Banned
Banned
Joined
Jul 28, 2015
Messages
25
Reaction score
0
Surely having many more limbs would improve both offence, defence and angles

I've seen multiple MMA fighters missing limbs, yet none with extra limbs.


Would this be classed as a PED?

P.s. what is your favourite fighters favourite limb?
 
Great, thats all we need.. a octopus in the octagon o_Oo_O
 
Why are there no conjoined MMA fighters?

ernie.gif
 
Surely having many more limbs would improve both offence, defence and angles

I've seen multiple MMA fighters missing limbs, yet none with extra limbs.


Would this be classed as a PED?

P.s. what is your favourite fighters favourite limb?

It would be an unfair advantage. Only Conor has enough power to knock out two heads at the same time.
 
Logged on for the first time today and this is the first thread I see.

What the fuck did I walk into?
 
newell1.gif


Imagine this guy had 4 more limbs (7.6 in total). He'd be nearly unbeatable.

gRQKiRx.gif


Except imagine he also had 4 more limbs (8 in total).


Weight advantages would be less significant.

They should have different limb-classes as well as weight-classes.
 
Surely having many more limbs would improve both offence, defence and angles

I've seen multiple MMA fighters missing limbs, yet none with extra limbs.


Would this be classed as a PED?

P.s. what is your favourite fighters favourite limb?
l6qGsmT.gif
 
Back
Top