I've seen numerous threads and posters giving Bobby credit for those jabs vs Cannoniere. All I can think to myself is WTF. It's easy to jab a guy with a broken forearm. Props for the head kick, but everything thrown after was easy mode vs a very injured opponent. I could have gone out there and jabbed Cannoniere to a win after that injury. You're insane for thinking those jabs took skill or won him the fight. So the question is: why? Why do these people fail to give primary credit to the obvious devastating injury? I personally think that they want to feel like they're knowledgeable about mma / combat sports. Experts always love to focus on a powerful jab in their analyses, so these pseudo forum experts want to do the same. If all it came down to was a broken forearm, then they don't feel like an expert, because any knucklehead can point out the guys arm broke and that's why he lost. Nooo, it was the JAB that did it, they thought, so they can feel good about themselves. Thoughts?