Discussion in 'UFC Discussion' started by WASSUPBRO, Aug 25, 2018.
they both always outstrike their opponents
whose better on the feet?
Gap hasn't been a striker since 08
GSP is the better fighter. Conor would be the more dynamic striker.
GSP doesn't have the KO power Conor does.
am i livin in the same planet as you guys? GSP is an amazing striker
Both pale in comparison to Julian Lane.
Gsp is not a amazing striker, not even close actually.
GSP has actually used his striking against people his height or higher and has been effective.
Conor just fights manlets for the most part......If you look at his non manlet record he is 3-2 against em....Think about that, 3-2 against non manlets(with a wikipedia page)......Conor's striking isn't effective against non manlets!!!!!
Since you said striking and not just boxing, gotta go with GSP.
Dude has way better kickboxing, solid round kicks, switch kicks. Conors kicks are funny looking
hes on par with prime anderson silva
he outstruck everyone watch gsp vs Nick diaz, koscheck, dan hardy thiago alves. perfect striking
hes an elite level striker
GSP has far better striking defense, conor has far better power.
If GSP actually makes 155 and they fight, GSP will win the striking just by avoiding the left, landing jabs, and, most importantly, keeping conor terrified of the inevitable takedown.
Conor, but GSP is the better MMA fighter and he'd be the better MMA striker after 7 minutes.
And unlike the khabib in situation, GSP wouldn't be in imminent danger each second the fight is on the feet--GSP is a very good striker with some of the best defense in the game.
GSP got KO'ed by a 5 ft 6 inch midget.
The threat of GSP’s takedown makes his striking very effective.
He's a very underrated striker in MMA.
Separate names with a comma.