Who should be Kubrat "the cobra" Pulevs next opponent?

Sebbe

is a nice guy
@Gold
Joined
Feb 9, 2010
Messages
15,071
Reaction score
0
As far as I can see Sauerland doesn't have a new fight for Pulev. Kind of odd seeing that Povetkin and Klitschko are destined to meet. Are they really sitting him out until that fight has been done? His last fight was in the fall 2012.

Anyway, who would you like for him to meet meanwhile?

I say bring on Fury, Helenius or Chagaev.
 
I can't believe I'm going to say this...
but Malik Scott.

Scott beat Vyacheslav Glazkov.... and Glazkov was considered quite the rising talent.
He make Tor Hamer look like a journey man.
 
Pulev is in a bind because he can't fight without the IBF approving the opponent, or else he loses his shot at mandatory challenger status. It's why he's not fought recently. Fury turned the fight down, as has Chagaev. Sauerland want him back out, and have hinted at Chisora if he beats Scott. (Fancy Scott to win, personally.)

If Tony Thompson repeats the win over David Price then he's an option
 
There's really no win in fighting Chagaev.
That's a lose/lose.

There was a time when Chagaev was considered something. But those days have passed.
 
It was just to keep Pulev active and because the IBF would have sanctioned it, I think.
 
Interesting that Fury turned the fight down considering Pulev being pretty short? Right? When it comes to Chagaev, I still believe he is a nice name on anyone's record. He's got a name, so therefor the fight would be interesting for Pulev.

I have got to be fair, I haven't seen Scott so I can't say anything on that.
 
Interesting that Fury turned the fight down considering Pulev being pretty short? Right? When it comes to Chagaev, I still believe he is a nice name on anyone's record. He's got a name, so therefor the fight would be interesting for Pulev.

Not that surprising, considering Pulev is largely unknown in the UK, and is one of the better heavyweights around - best that doesn't have the surname "Klitschko," in my opinion. Pulev would likely get past Fury's reach - his jab could be a lot better - and fire off combinations. I doubt that Fury's camp want his first loss to be to someone most casual fans have never heard of.
 
Well from a economic standpoint I have to agree, and I would slightly favor Pulev if they fought. However, I get the feeling that Fury likes to be "the bigger guy" in his fights and he would be a lot bigger than Pulev. So from a standpoint of what fighters in the top of the rankings could he win against, I would believe that Fury himself thinks he would win against Pulev. Therefor might make the fight a possibility
 
Fury also turned down Pulev when the Haye bout looked (more) likely. Haye brings in much more money and about the same level of respect as Pulev would.
 
Well from a economic standpoint I have to agree, and I would slightly favor Pulev if they fought. However, I get the feeling that Fury likes to be "the bigger guy" in his fights and he would be a lot bigger than Pulev. So from a standpoint of what fighters in the top of the rankings could he win against, I would believe that Fury himself thinks he would win against Pulev. Therefor might make the fight a possibility

I don't think Fury's confidence makes the fight a possibility. It's a business decision. If Pulev was well known throughout the UK and there'd be big money on offer, a fight would have at least been discussed.

I'm not convinced the Haye fight is dead, but other than that fight I believe Mick Hennessey's plan is to manoeuvre Fury into a fight for the WBC title, should Vitali retire and the belt is vacated.
 
1 Kubrat Pulev Bulgaria
2 NOT RATED
3 Bryant Jennings United States
4 Johnathon Banks United States
5 Ruslan Chagaev Uzbekistan
6 Robert Helenius Germany
7 Alexander Ustinov Russian Federation
8 Tony Thompson United States
9 Alexander Dimitrenko Germany
10 Vyacheslav Glazkov United States
11 Tyson Fury England
12 Tomasz Adamek Poland
13 Malik Scott United States
14 David Price England
15 Deontay Wilder United States
 
I have no idea how someone like Pulev, Chagaev, Charr, etc. make it far in the fight game. They're horrible to watch and I think their size intimidates their opponents more than anything else. I don't know why their opponents don't just wail into them because these guys aren't even big punchers. It almost seems like a song and dance where the more popular and heralded fighter controls the pace of the action and the opponent just gives in. It's almost as if he is hypnotized and gives the more famous fighter more respect and credit than he actually deserves based on his skills. This makes me believe that the best connected fighters are the ones that get all of these opportunities and easy roads paved for them because I refuse to believe that these are the best heavyweight boxers out there. This often leads me to believe that much of boxing is fixed. Boxing, especially the heavyweight division, reminds me of the music industry where talent and skill alone isn't what brings you to the top. The connections, record companies, etc. is what brings you to the forefront and keeps you there and paves an easy road for you. The best musicians are probably overlooked and not given an opportunity through management, etc. and this leads me to believe that boxers are the same. Maybe boxers are chosen based on how they can handle the limelight and attention? The last thing boxing probably needs for is image is another Mike Tyson type that is running around causing mayhem so they choose these Europeans that are well-adjusted and nurture and mold them into paper champions.
 
I have no idea how someone like Pulev, Chagaev, Charr, etc. make it far in the fight game. They're horrible to watch and I think their size intimidates their opponents more than anything else. I don't know why their opponents don't just wail into them because these guys aren't even big punchers. It almost seems like a song and dance where the more popular and heralded fighter controls the pace of the action and the opponent just gives in. It's almost as if he is hypnotized and gives the more famous fighter more respect and credit than he actually deserves based on his skills. This makes me believe that the best connected fighters are the ones that get all of these opportunities and easy roads paved for them because I refuse to believe that these are the best heavyweight boxers out there. This often leads me to believe that much of boxing is fixed. Boxing, especially the heavyweight division, reminds me of the music industry where talent and skill alone isn't what brings you to the top. The connections, record companies, etc. is what brings you to the forefront and keeps you there and paves an easy road for you. The best musicians are probably overlooked and not given an opportunity through management, etc. and this leads me to believe that boxers are the same. Maybe boxers are chosen based on how they can handle the limelight and attention? The last thing boxing probably needs for is image is another Mike Tyson type that is running around causing mayhem so they choose these Europeans that are well-adjusted and nurture and mold them into paper champions.

2ia4lea.jpg
 
I have no idea how someone like Pulev, Chagaev, Charr, etc. make it far in the fight game. They're horrible to watch and I think their size intimidates their opponents more than anything else. I don't know why their opponents don't just wail into them because these guys aren't even big punchers. It almost seems like a song and dance where the more popular and heralded fighter controls the pace of the action and the opponent just gives in. It's almost as if he is hypnotized and gives the more famous fighter more respect and credit than he actually deserves based on his skills. This makes me believe that the best connected fighters are the ones that get all of these opportunities and easy roads paved for them because I refuse to believe that these are the best heavyweight boxers out there. This often leads me to believe that much of boxing is fixed. Boxing, especially the heavyweight division, reminds me of the music industry where talent and skill alone isn't what brings you to the top. The connections, record companies, etc. is what brings you to the forefront and keeps you there and paves an easy road for you. The best musicians are probably overlooked and not given an opportunity through management, etc. and this leads me to believe that boxers are the same. Maybe boxers are chosen based on how they can handle the limelight and attention? The last thing boxing probably needs for is image is another Mike Tyson type that is running around causing mayhem so they choose these Europeans that are well-adjusted and nurture and mold them into paper champions.

tumblr_me6lgbvEMI1rg1i0co1_500_zpse4baec92.gif
 
I have no idea how someone like Pulev, Chagaev, Charr, etc. make it far in the fight game. They're horrible to watch and I think their size intimidates their opponents more than anything else. I don't know why their opponents don't just wail into them because these guys aren't even big punchers. It almost seems like a song and dance where the more popular and heralded fighter controls the pace of the action and the opponent just gives in. It's almost as if he is hypnotized and gives the more famous fighter more respect and credit than he actually deserves based on his skills. This makes me believe that the best connected fighters are the ones that get all of these opportunities and easy roads paved for them because I refuse to believe that these are the best heavyweight boxers out there. This often leads me to believe that much of boxing is fixed. Boxing, especially the heavyweight division, reminds me of the music industry where talent and skill alone isn't what brings you to the top. The connections, record companies, etc. is what brings you to the forefront and keeps you there and paves an easy road for you. The best musicians are probably overlooked and not given an opportunity through management, etc. and this leads me to believe that boxers are the same. Maybe boxers are chosen based on how they can handle the limelight and attention? The last thing boxing probably needs for is image is another Mike Tyson type that is running around causing mayhem so they choose these Europeans that are well-adjusted and nurture and mold them into paper champions.
Charr has made it far? Come again?
 
I have no idea how someone like Pulev, Chagaev, Charr, etc. make it far in the fight game. They're horrible to watch and I think their size intimidates their opponents more than anything else..
Chagaev's size intimidates his opponents? Don't think he is terrible to watch either....at least he wasn't during his run up to his Klitschko fight. Did you mean someone else?
 
Back
Top