Then I was wrong if I said none of them could beat him. I said he is so good to make a lot of the rounds close and he gets every close round so having a conversation around who could win becomes less feasible because every swing round goes his way. He is fighting some ATG's and he is on his way to that position, but I would rather put money on him than the others because he gets so many close rounds. I am a big fan of his ability but I can objectively say that swing rounds are his rounds. I am not wrong in saying that. Nor did I intend to convey that preferential judging is the only reason. In an effort to rectify this, I have again included my appreciation for the talent that helped get him this far.
For the above reasons I think he would beat most of them.
And "dramatic" doesn't describe it. There isn't some bawdy display of emotions here. If anything I am being quite aloof and aware that even I fighter I like can get some landslides that maybe should have been a lot tighter on the cards, and some close ones that maybe shouldn't have gone his way. But the maybe decisions happen all the time for him. Not once against him. Damn peculiar. Is that incorrect? Your reaction is perhaps more subjective than you'll be willing to admit. I am at least saying perhaps, and not pointing fingers because if I am mistaken on that last observation that's fine with me.