Who had a better career? Nick or Ruthless

[KAZSoliloquy]

Not really.

But it's 2020+.

Words are meaning fluid.

a journeyman would be someone who bounces from promotion to promotion with mixed success, no? that’s exactly robbie lawler.

 

[RogerB08]

If we're talking about exciting fights, Robbie. From a consistency standpoint, gotta go with Nick.

 

[Shishio]

I would say Robbie had a better career but Nick had a more consistent career..... Nick sorta hovered around the same area for his whole career, at one point Lawler was completely written off, if you had told me circa 2006-2012 that Lawler was gonna win the title in 2014 I woulda called you a crack addict

 

[Swarthy]

Lawler was a champ. Nick was fun but never came close to the heights Lawler hit.

 

[JKS]

Robbie no doubt, reached the highest level of the sport.

 

[El Fernas]

Lawler, Nick has some wins and held the SF belt, but Lawler got the UFC belt and his resurgence going from MW at SF to WW at the UFC was incredible title run.

 

[10000yearsold]

Even if Nick had won last week, still Robbie.

 

[downthepines]

Robby lawler Bobby sprawler Robert brawler.

 

[Bend NvR Break]

you can be both.

A journeyman will never fight for a title.

A contender will never win a title.

A champ won a title.

 

[KAZSoliloquy]

A journeyman will never fight for a title.

A contender will never win a title.

A champ won a title.

pretty arbitrary reasoning but okay. guy had a good streak and found consistent success for 3 years out of his 20 year career.

 

[Natural Order]

Not even really a question to be honest. Robbie Lawler acheived UFC gold and defended it long after most MMA pundits had called a day on his fighting career.

It's one of the great comeback tales in MMA history so far.