interesting question
GSP- Hendricks
Gsp 3-2. I never got the outrage for this one. Just because Dana went crazy? Please. Hendricks had the clearer rounds but GSP won 3 out of 5...
Conor- Nate II
3-2 conor. Sorry nate, started too slow
Rampage- Machida
2-1 rampage. Not enough for a 10-8 in the 3rd for machida imo
Lawler-Condit
3-2 condit. Sucks for him tbh. Should have been champ
Gus-Jones
3-2 Jones. Elbow stole it at the end
Condit-Diaz
3-2 condit. Bizzare imo that people think diaz won
Bj-Frankie I
3-2 BJ. Honestly could have been 4-1. I dunno wtf the judges were watching lol
Shogun-Machida I
3-2 either way tbh. Closer than people intially acted like
BJ-GSP 1
Bj 2-1. Sorry. GSP did nothing here.
GSP- Hendricks
Hendricks and it was not close.
Momentum was all on Hendricks side. GSP had nothing.
Not saying Hendricks is better than GSP, and if there was a rematch I sure think GSP would thoroughly beat Hendricks, but he lost that fight.
Conor- Nate II
Nate. Running from the fight should award one point deduction, and Conor did plenty of running.
Rampage- Machida
Machida. and again, not even close.
Lawler-Condit
Condit fanboys ALWAYS claim he won, no matter how thoroughly he's beaten.
Lawler beat the running men.
Gus-Jones
Gus. Another robbery because the other guy is a dominant favorite.
This is an issue with judges and their biased views. A challenger has to end the fight or the favorite champion wins.
Condit-Diaz
Another Condit fight. See above.
Bj-Frankie I
Frankie won. And proved every single BJ fanboys wrong. Then did it again. And again.
About time BJ Fanboys let it go.
Shogun-Machida I
As a huge Machida Fan, I am mad he won that fight.
I rather he would have lost than a win via judges highway robbery (a way I would think Jon Jones and GSP fanboys would share, but they are too blind)
BJ-GSP 1
GSP. Another BJ fanboys fight they can't stomach.
Unless vaseline did happen, then GSP should have been DQ'd.
But then again, far too long in the past to cry over it.