Who do you rate higher: Marciano or Tyson?

Discussion in 'Boxing Discussion' started by StewDogg11, Nov 29, 2019.

?

Pick One

  1. Marciano

    47.5%
  2. Tyson

    52.5%
  1. Yacob

    Yacob WBC Interim Junior Welterweight White Truffle Belt Yellow Card

    Joined:
    Apr 18, 2019
    Messages:
    6,117
    Likes Received:
    14,552
    Location:
    Maine
    Ew....
     
  2. cocksure

    cocksure Silver Belt

    Joined:
    Dec 28, 2007
    Messages:
    11,801
    Likes Received:
    5,243
    Location:
    England
    Ali/Louis aside, Prime Larry beats them all.
     
    eternaldarkness likes this.
  3. borntoloseNOT

    borntoloseNOT Brown Belt

    Joined:
    Oct 22, 2004
    Messages:
    3,091
    Likes Received:
    2,107
    Weird because he wasn't far removed from his prime when Tyson took his soul, I would say Holmes is highly underappreciated but that Tyson fight showed an apparent difference in class and is an undervalued win for Mike.
     
  4. borntoloseNOT

    borntoloseNOT Brown Belt

    Joined:
    Oct 22, 2004
    Messages:
    3,091
    Likes Received:
    2,107
    Here is a question: if Larry Holmes jab couldn't deter prime Tyson, do you all believe Lewis with his jab, were he to have met Tyson during the unification as the youngest years, been able to stop Tyson or even have gotten the win at all like he did when they fought way later in their careers?
     
  5. JayE

    JayE Red Belt

    Joined:
    Oct 22, 2016
    Messages:
    8,577
    Likes Received:
    11,414
    Tyson has the better list of wins, but Marciano was undefeated. Head to head, I don't think many would take Marciano. I could see it going a few different ways, but I might lean towards Tyson. Marciano really didn't have a long run at the elite level, all things considered (not really his fault, as injuries cut his career pretty short).
     
  6. JayE

    JayE Red Belt

    Joined:
    Oct 22, 2016
    Messages:
    8,577
    Likes Received:
    11,414
    I'd argue that Marciano wasn't as crude as some would suggest, but he's not a guy I'd ever call highly technical. Honestly, of the two, Tyson was clearly the cleaner technically. Marciano's big advantage over Tyson was his freak stamina and ability to carry his punch every round of the fight.
     
    SandisLL and eternaldarkness like this.
  7. JayE

    JayE Red Belt

    Joined:
    Oct 22, 2016
    Messages:
    8,577
    Likes Received:
    11,414
    An undefeated record definitely does matter, but Tyson was fighting at the world level from the time he was 20 in around his 25th fight. Marciano wasn't facing true world level guys until he he was 28 and nearly in his 40th fight. Tyson's sporadic form really does count against him, but if we're talking simply wins on paper and in context, I'd definitely take Tyson's win list over Marciano's. You do have to weigh the losses as well, though, and that makes it genuinely close.
     
  8. cocksure

    cocksure Silver Belt

    Joined:
    Dec 28, 2007
    Messages:
    11,801
    Likes Received:
    5,243
    Location:
    England
    How can an out of retirement Larry be close to prime?
    And if Lennox had took that shot from Shavers, he'd have been out for a week.
     
  9. I am your real dad

    I am your real dad I am surrounded by NERDs !!!

    Joined:
    Jan 15, 2019
    Messages:
    4,917
    Likes Received:
    4,925
    Location:
    West Virginia
    Tyson did not fight many big names and when he did he lost.

    Marciano fought big names and beat them.
     
    eternaldarkness likes this.
  10. djacobox372

    djacobox372 Gold Belt

    Joined:
    Apr 27, 2006
    Messages:
    20,917
    Likes Received:
    5,003
    Charles was the only great fighter he beat that wasn't pushing 40yo, and he was robbed in their last fight.

    Old farts Walcott and Moorer both nearly knocked Marciano out.
     
  11. eternaldarkness

    eternaldarkness Black Belt

    Joined:
    May 26, 2014
    Messages:
    5,110
    Likes Received:
    2,755
    Location:
    Wyrdstone 101
    had the best "active" parry in the business, moved his head really well and was sneaky as fuck setting his shots up. ever wondered how someone can load up a massive right hand and still land it. rocky is one of the most underrated fighters of all time, when it comes to technique. no one closed the gap and stayed on top of his opponents as well as marciano, except maybe henry armstrong. his entries where miles better than mikes, who relied heavily on his speed to close the gap.
    mike was highly predictable in the way he set his shots up, if you had the balls to fight him, and stand your ground. watch him struggle against holyfield and douglas, or even an extremely overmatched don halpin. halpin had him continuously walking onto right hand leads, because tyson queued off the 1-2 to slip in with his left hook. tyson was extremely flawed as a boxer, but his incredible physical attributes went a long way to masking these flaws.
     
    SandisLL likes this.
  12. eternaldarkness

    eternaldarkness Black Belt

    Joined:
    May 26, 2014
    Messages:
    5,110
    Likes Received:
    2,755
    Location:
    Wyrdstone 101
    and a "can" like douglas, did knock tyson out. a young mike tyson.
     
  13. eternaldarkness

    eternaldarkness Black Belt

    Joined:
    May 26, 2014
    Messages:
    5,110
    Likes Received:
    2,755
    Location:
    Wyrdstone 101
    i wouldn't even favour louis or ali to beat holmes. the guys criminally underrated.
     
  14. SandisLL

    SandisLL Green Belt

    Joined:
    Apr 29, 2019
    Messages:
    1,446
    Likes Received:
    591
    Media wasn't that developed in Rocky era ( of course in Dempsey era to be noticed was even FAR more difficult than in Rocky era ).
    Pro boxing heavily depends from 1. Media 2. Matchmakers 3. Promoters 4. Managers
    Modern pro boxing is accompanied by media PR specialists too to get athlete more lucrative for public to see.

    Yes plus Mike most likely in his true prime was the fastest ( legs ) HW boxer world ever had & had good height change mechanics.

    I think that he was lucky to have beautiful team, sadly he changed coaches and then ….Irone Mike relatively quickly becomed slower.
    Maybe another exercises programm etc stuff?
     
    eternaldarkness likes this.
  15. SandisLL

    SandisLL Green Belt

    Joined:
    Apr 29, 2019
    Messages:
    1,446
    Likes Received:
    591
    Wasn't because otherwise he had been beated heavily and hard outgunned while closed distance.

    Mike was 22 years old in true prime when he won 39 ( 40 ) years old out of prime Holmes….
    Mike lost bouts to Holyfield that was only 4 years older than Mike.
     
  16. eternaldarkness

    eternaldarkness Black Belt

    Joined:
    May 26, 2014
    Messages:
    5,110
    Likes Received:
    2,755
    Location:
    Wyrdstone 101
    i agree with you about tyson's foot speed, it was exceptional. mike wasn't as good at drawing a lead as rocky, but he was brilliant at making his opponents panic punch (throw punches, from to far out without proper set ups). if someone overextended against tyson they were dead meat. tyson didn't deal well with people that he couldn't back up and this is the main reason i would heavily favour foreman over tyson in a theoretical matchup.
     
    SandisLL likes this.
  17. TeenageMutantLesnarTurtle

    TeenageMutantLesnarTurtle Purple Belt

    Joined:
    May 14, 2017
    Messages:
    2,153
    Likes Received:
    2,896
    Its apples to oranges kind of because there was a lot of advancement in the sport between their eras. Head to head Tyson would have murdered Rocky, and the level of competition in Tysons era was better, but again, its relative to the times.
     
  18. SandisLL

    SandisLL Green Belt

    Joined:
    Apr 29, 2019
    Messages:
    1,446
    Likes Received:
    591
    Partially.
    Mike won 39 ( 40 ) years old Holmes out of prime,
    Holmes at 31 years of age won seriously ill Ali that was barely part of shadow from previous Ali.
    Non shadow Ali didn't had easy wons ower Fraizer or Foreman or Shavers.

    Prime Fraizer most likely KOed prime Mike, if he was in ring instead of 39 (40 ) years old Holmes against 22 years old Mike.
    Ali had better reach than Tyson and his hands weren't slower than prime Tyson's hands ( legs I think prime Tyson had faster than Ali )…..
    And Fraizer seriously " improved " his Health permanently…..
    Shavers, OMG, and Foreman too.

    These three boxers : Fraizer, Foreman and Shavers I look like possible hardest road for prime 22 years old Mike, not 39 years old out of prime Holmes.
    30 years old Holmes most likely KOed Mike….
     
    eternaldarkness likes this.
  19. eternaldarkness

    eternaldarkness Black Belt

    Joined:
    May 26, 2014
    Messages:
    5,110
    Likes Received:
    2,755
    Location:
    Wyrdstone 101
    to compare tyson to american football, he was like the team that runs only half a dozen plays, with very little variation, but the plays are so good very few teams can stop them. fighters like this are extremely dangerous in form, but tend to look bad when their opponents figure them out. i have seen fighters do everything right against marciano and still lose (walcott and charles). when someone took the fight to tyson he usually lost. bruno and ruddock are the only two people i have seen mike beat that actually put up a fight, even tillis was starting to lace tyson towards the end of the match. there are worlds between tyson and marciano.
     
  20. borntoloseNOT

    borntoloseNOT Brown Belt

    Joined:
    Oct 22, 2004
    Messages:
    3,091
    Likes Received:
    2,107
    Why didn't Spinks or the super experienced Holmes figure Mike out then? They were at the top of the division, if Mike was going to get figured out by being too unvaried wouldn't this class of fighter?
     

Share This Page

  1. This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
    By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.