- Joined
- May 7, 2016
- Messages
- 42,438
- Reaction score
- 20,355
Neither. Both are simplistic shooters designed for controller systems.
Any recommendations of better series in the genre?
Neither. Both are simplistic shooters designed for controller systems.
Neither. Both are simplistic shooters designed for controller systems.
Call of Duty 4 is best FPS ever IMO.
Battlefield was always too clunky and big maps for me. Plus vehicles is just dumb and not balanced at all IMO.
battlefield series the whole way, tho I do see merits that CoD had aside from zombies ((Which should have been its own game)) in BF tho....theres nothing funner and more gratifying that knifing people and taking their tags.....that goes double if its a sniper
You're just proving my point, vehicles don't belong in balanced FPS games. That's why competitive Halo never has them in, that's the only other main FPS that I can think of that uses a lot of vehicles.How is driving a tank, jet, helicopter "dumb "? And how are you supposed to balance vehicles? That's the point. They're not balanced. You want an apache to be balanced?? As opposed to what?
hehehetbh I hate the knife kill animations in BF. It works both ways bro. It's the ultimate satisfaction, but also the ultimate terror. My ego can't handle being knifed (And possibly teabagged) so I've become a nervous wreck in BF
In COD getting knifed is like whatever. CSGO it's not even a threat so I play completely helaxed
You're just proving my point, vehicles don't belong in balanced FPS games. That's why competitive Halo never has them in, that's the only other main FPS that I can think of that uses a lot of vehicles.
When tanks were in COD5 everyone hated it.
Call of Duty is a way better pure FPS than clunky ass battlefield where half the players dick around in vehicles and the other half sit with a sniper in the very back of the map.
Call of Duty 4 is the last great FPS, no battlefield game has even come close to selling as many copies are garnering as much rave reviews and support after release. For that reason I think COD is easily better than battlefield.
Seriously this shouldn't even be a debate but is because people love bashing COD, Call of Duty jump started the entire YouTube commentator/streaming scene that fuels video games today. All the first commentators on YouTube played call of duty and it remained the most popular game for years and years. Battlefield had no effect like that, COD literally brought gaming to the next level and introduced commentating.
Seriously sounds like hyperbole but COD made Machinima Respawn and almost single handidly started the YouTube/twitch/JustinTV gaming boom. For that reason alone the franchise's influence way outreaches anything Battlefield did.
Any recommendations of better series in the genre?
I could never get into the mouse and keyboard controls to play video games. I think it's because I started off playing video games in the mid 80's with an Atari 2600 then an NES to a Genesis etc... I also never had a computer until I was 20 years old and got one for my job when I worked for the cable company.
When I was in the Army and over in Kuwait in 2006 the guys in my squad and I would network our laptops and play Farcry and Battlefield and I fucking hated it, because I couldn't get used to the controls. I really wanted to like it but It just wasn't fun to me.
hehehe
thats why I target snipers....it demoralizes the heck out of them....you get a sniper twice in one match and they suddenly get very nervous about being scoped in
its along the same lines of landmining the enemy base and make them nervous about driving out in vehicles and c4ing tanks lol
psych warfare, Battlefield