Which fighter embodies the true spirit of martial arts the most?

tuckermaclain

Rust Belt
@Brown
Joined
Sep 9, 2007
Messages
2,559
Reaction score
1,063
For example, Tank was just a barroom brawler who could move a train with a punch. He trained on a bar stool. He probably cant spell martial arts.

Machida has trained since a child. Has always shown respect for his opponents win-or-lose. He takes relatively little damage. He relies on speed and skill rather than brawn. He seems to be the complete martial artist.

Some may think GSP, but they'd be wrong.
 
Because Machida does, means GSP can't ?

That's some solid shertard logic right there...................
 
giphy.gif
 
Covington
Rousey
Conor
Jones
 
Because Machida does, means GSP can't ?

That's some solid shertard logic right there...................

I said "most." Yes, that means if Machida does, GSP can't. Do you think GSP embodies the true spirit of martial arts the most? Since you are an amature fighter, your opinion does carry a lot weight because you've been there. You know what it's about much more than the rest of us who may have only sparred at the most.
 
For example, Tank was just a barroom brawler who could move a train with a punch. He trained on a bar stool. He probably cant spell martial arts.

Machida has trained since a child. Has always shown respect for his opponents win-or-lose. He takes relatively little damage. He relies on speed and skill rather than brawn. He seems to be the complete martial artist.

Some may think GSP, but they'd be wrong.
Anyone who trains. Whether its in a garage or a multi-million dollar facility. Fame has nothing to do with it.
 
I said "most." Yes, that means if Machida does, GSP can't. Do you think GSP embodies the true spirit of martial arts the most? Since you are an amature fighter, your opinion does carry a lot weight because you've been there. You know what it's about much more than the rest of us who may have only sparred at the most.

It's a pretty subjective thing. I can't say one way or the other which one embodies it the most. But I think your criteria is a little flawed, mostly the damage one. GSP also uses speed and skill, and adds in the brawn. He's (IMO) the overall better MMA. Not hating on machida at all, just my opinion, just as the OP is yours.
 
For example, Tank was just a barroom brawler who could move a train with a punch. He trained on a bar stool. He probably cant spell martial arts.

Machida has trained since a child. Has always shown respect for his opponents win-or-lose. He takes relatively little damage. He relies on speed and skill rather than brawn. He seems to be the complete martial artist.

Some may think GSP, but they'd be wrong.
? why would they be wrong thinking GSP?
 
Gsp. Gracie entire family . Shogun. Fedor. Sonnen. All fighters from China.
 

Love me some Bones. That being said, I'm not sure he embodies the spirit of martial arts the way the TS is talking about (if at all).

Now, if you said the best, most naturally talented/gifted fighter ever to step foot inside the Octagon, he'd definitely get my vote.
 
Nick Diaz.

Prepared for warfare at any moment.

Doesn't take roids like Anderson.

Machida has trained since a child. Has always shown respect for his opponents win-or-lose. He takes relatively little damage. He relies on speed and skill rather than brawn. He seems to be the complete martial artist.

Some may think GSP, but they'd be wrong.

Everything you said is true about GSP too.
He also didn't get killed by someone on Cocaine like Machida.
 
Harold Howard. Cos aint none of the punk ass bitches in MMA today ever tried a front flip kick.

It didnt work, but at least he tried.
 
Back
Top