Yeah if the fight was 6 rounds, or if they scored more heavily for the 5th Nate would've won
It is always weird when someone wins the fight, but looks nearly broken at the end, but they technically won more rounds so they win
COCKSUCKA
love this guy. what happened to him????
nate simply because he actually fought
but they're both journeymen, c'mon bros. the diaz guys are highly overrated
what is nathaniel diaz's best win????? i'm talking about contender in the division. it was probably cowboy cerrone at LW
what is nicholas diaz's best win?????????? FRANK SHAMROCK? he barely beat BJ Penn
i don't think either guy has beat a top 5 guy
The Diaz brothers would be both champions if fights were 10 rounds.
BJ d d d dDOMINATED the first roundBarely beat BJ? You may want to give that a rewatch
Both are about the same.
Both failed to beat elite fighters at every single opportunity.
Conor is undoubtedly an all time great. Similarly as good as bj (elite but poor cardio). Definitely better than shamrock, gomi, lawler lolNick has better wins imo, even if Nate beat Conor, at the same time Conor isnt exactly an all time great despite the 2 belt thing, Nick beat Lawler, BJ Penn, Shamrock, Gomi.
Agree with all that.Nick is. Nick’s overall boxing game is better, better bodywork, better combinations. I think his BJJ is a little slicker too. Nate has better trips and throws, and is a *bit* better at cutting off the cage rather than just following the opponent. They’re very close and very similar, but Nick edges it out for me.
That’s not how it works man.Conor fought like an idiot in that fight and beat him the next time, definitely not Conor at his absolute best