Which bidder for UFC do you prefer?

Who would you rather purchase UFC?


  • Total voters
    161
  • Poll closed .

FrankieNYC

STUFF!
Platinum Member
Joined
Mar 16, 2013
Messages
30,389
Reaction score
1
Taken from the info from this thread - http://forums.sherdog.com/threads/report-ufc-bids-due-this-week-bidders-named.3268591/
Which of the bidders would your prefer?

1. William Morris Endeavor (also known as WME) is an American talent agency with offices in Beverly Hills. The company was founded in April 2009, after the merger of the William Morris Agency and the Endeavor Agency. WME represents artists across all media platforms, specifically movies, television, music, theatre, digital and publishing. It also represents the NFL. The company is run by Co-CEOs Ari Emanuel and Patrick Whitesell.

2. China Media Capital is a public equity and venture capital firm specializing in growth capital, mid venture, late venture, emerging growth, corporate restructuring, management buyouts, and mergers & acquisitions. The firm prefers to invest in the cultural, technology, media, entertainment, consumer, medical treatment, and telecommunication sectors. It prefers to invest in and outside China. China Media Capital was founded in 2009 and is based in Shanghai, China with an additional office in Beijing

3. Wanda Group is a Chinese conglomerate and China's "biggest private property developer" and the world's largest cinema chain operator, owning Wanda Cinemas, and the Hoyts Group.
The company operates in four major industries—commercial property, luxury hotels, culture and tourism, and department stores. It was established in Dalian, Liaoning and is now headquartered in Beijing.
 
WME mainly for the NFL connection & the fact I don't think they will change it as much as a company based outside of USA
 
201603_1556_gcbbd_sm.png
 
Please not the Chinese....PLEASE
 
^^^^
Enters clearly labeled thread to announce he does not care!
Thus proving he cared enough to post!
I kind of agree. It's a valid question, but without knowing how any of these companies would run the UFC, it's tough to really pick one. I kind of assume all giant companies are run by assholes, so whichever assholes put on the best fights, that's who I vote for.
 
Everyone has a reason. You don't gotta lie to kick it. ;)
But I really don't give a heck. So I don't know what's going on here...

Must I give a heck? Because I don't.
 
I kind of agree. It's a valid question, but without knowing how any of these companies would run the UFC, it's tough to really pick one. I kind of assume all giant companies are run by assholes, so whichever assholes put on the best fights, that's who I vote for.
He could also have just put I don't give a heck as an option...
 
Don't have a preference.

I do think Zuffa have creatively plateaued and anybody willing to buy likely has new ideas for the brand.
 
I guess A. Keep it with Americans, even if they're a bunch of Hollywood liberal fucks
 
China Media Capitol.


Seems like they would take the bigger risk, bring real super fights, make UFC more international...Hell maybe even bring back PRIDE Rules.


Seems like people vote against Chinda Media Capitol because it has china in the name.


Wanda Group = Too Mainstream, they won't do anything revolutionary for the sport.


William Mirris Endeavor = Too Mainstream/Too American....Again they won't do anything to push the sport.
 
I meant I agree with not giving a heck, incase that was in question.
Nah, ts just seems bothered by the fact that I would post that I don't give a heck, when not giving a heck about a bunch of corporations you know virtually nothing about is easily the most rational choice.

Just taking a moment for solidarity.
 
Nah, ts just seems bothered by the fact that I would post that I don't give a heck

Not bothered at all.
I just never understood going into a clearly labeled thread just to post IDC.
Makes no sense to me.
 
Not the Chinese ones, keep this sport boiling in the Americas. For me/us. Thanks.
 
Back
Top