Where is deadshot at?

They aren't complicated at all. I suggest reading their book about programming. Why aren't they complicated because all of the thinking has been done for you based on years of research of top strength athletes and coaches. Coan, Kirk and all of those old school guys relied heavily on weight gain to gain strength so a simple linear progression would work for anybody. Anybody can gorge themselves follow a simple program and make progress and claim here we have the holy grail of programming and you do not need to do anything else. Even guys like Jonnie Candito who used to dislike RPE programs have finally come around and are now putting out videos promoting the usage of auto regulation. Unless you are paid to train or have your lifestyle so in tact that it supports your lifting you will eventually need a way to auto regulate rather than just bull your way through training every time you train. Why would you not use a system that all of the variables have already been accounted for outside of the gym by experts in the field? To prove to strangers on forums that you can gut out a max lift without getting injured?
Yeah I didn’t look into them, which I’m sure you could tell. And I understand the limitations to linear progressions whether they are periodized or not, I am just saying when you account for who was the strongest and hit the best lifts it tends to gravitate towards the guys in the 80s with the straight line periodization. I had some good success using Dan John’s even easier strength that really shocked me; I intuitively pushed my lower rep sets to where I thought they should be and blasted my regular work sets without having to worry about them. It was very relieving. I see wendler is big on pushing submaximal lifts too in order to push 1rm, but at the end of the day dollars for donuts the best lifters used simpler programs and worked harder for higher totals. You used cws’ total as an example of his program working, but dismiss kirk and coans totals as them eating their way to the top when both were lean as fuck totaling higher numbers
 
Yeah I didn’t look into them, which I’m sure you could tell. And I understand the limitations to linear progressions whether they are periodized or not, I am just saying when you account for who was the strongest and hit the best lifts it tends to gravitate towards the guys in the 80s with the straight line periodization. I had some good success using Dan John’s even easier strength that really shocked me; I intuitively pushed my lower rep sets to where I thought they should be and blasted my regular work sets without having to worry about them. It was very relieving. I see wendler is big on pushing submaximal lifts too in order to push 1rm, but at the end of the day dollars for donuts the best lifters used simpler programs and worked harder for higher totals. You used cws’ total as an example of his program working, but dismiss kirk and coans totals as them eating their way to the top when both were lean as fuck totaling higher numbers
Juggernaut AI includes linear progression. The app chooses your periodization style based on your input or metrics.
 
The program takes this into account as well as you input your weak points and sticking points.
 
I didn't like juggernaut ai. I've been working out for 20 years. I know how to pick a main lift and accessories. AI is low effort anyhow.

I want you to know that by my tenth year lifting, I would outdo all of your all time bests. And I'm a lifetime natural.

@Oblivian
 
It's easy to troll online, it's a lot harder to back it up.

Progress is not linear. Burn out, injuries, natural limits, life obligations all get in the way...
 
It's easy to troll online, it's a lot harder to back it up.

Progress is not linear. Burn out, injuries, natural limits, life obligations all get in the way...
That is why you cant just stay doing the same thing all year long. That is why conjugate/concurrent why not being optimal is pretty good because it keeps you from burning out and training all qualities. Crossfit IMO gets a lot of this fitness stuff right even with all of the bad that comes with it.
 
It's easy to troll online, it's a lot harder to back it up.

Progress is not linear. Burn out, injuries, natural limits, life obligations all get in the way...
He has over 10 years of lifting and is going backwards...
 
1% testosterone decline yearly from 30. Check win rates in mma for fighters +40.
Yes and the reason why is because people believed what they were told. There are a few exceptions that always refused to believe what they were told in every sport.
 
Tell that to Doug Hepburn who squatted 500 pounds for 15 reps at fifty years old.
Mmm good. Yeah strength stays. Speed goes down. Your sport is weight lifting. I'm 38 and as strong as when I was 23. I probably am slower. And need a bit more recovery. Probably.
 
Mmm good. Yeah strength stays. Speed goes down. Your sport is weight lifting. I'm 38 and as strong as when I was 23. I probably am slower. And need a bit more recovery. Probably.

Strength is the most important anyway. lol.
 
Yes and the reason why is because people believed what they were told. There are a few exceptions that always refused to believe what they were told in every sport.
How’s training going? Any progress updates? Getting ready to destroy a 1500lb total?
 
Back
Top