- Joined
- Sep 15, 2008
- Messages
- 27,773
- Reaction score
- 3,377
Lol - the irony and stupidity of your post is priceless . Gegard beats bisping 99/100 x. Bisping turned down a titled contract to face Gegard Mousasi...... claiming " bisping mousasi is bad for business ". Mousasi would ve been a -320 favorite over Bisping but Michael didnt want to lose the title he just won in " the perfect storm of all perfect storms".Perennial gatekeeper who managed to reach the pinnacle.Im guessing fans will have guys ranked ahead of him even though they never became a UFC champion cough*mousassi*cough.
Does he crack the Top 5 sherbros?
In fact , the London headline fight was supposed to be Bisping vs Mousasi.....as soon as a past his prime Anderson was thrown around , Michael and team quickly manipulated main event as mousasi was ,lol, kept on card and gave thales leites ( the BJJ practitioner who walked Michael down for 25 minutes in a split decision- just 3 months prior lmfao) the beating of his life ( ask him yourself ).
IN FACT- THAT WHOLE situation changed the trajectory of 185 division for years( when u think about it and being honest with yourself).
Michael Bisping, Matt Serra ...amongst a few others prove winning UFC title isnt the win all be all.
When you really get down to the hard truth of it all .... You cant even compare the careers of the 2 men- it's a joke. For people who know the sport , they know the know. There isnt one single thing that Bisping does better than Mousasi....not 1.
There is only one advantage- for whatever the reason ( lol- nothing to do with fighting), Bisping has drawing power because of his mouth ( he does bring it but his career is saturated with decision wins over mid tier middles where he was a significant favorite ).
Bisping is somewhere outside top 15( hell- maybe 20)Bisping isnt and never was elite.