- Joined
- Aug 6, 2014
- Messages
- 9,583
- Reaction score
- 0
In advance, I think the implication of the deal sucked & Dana acted like a tool on the recent video
But I see people quoting that 40% figure & it does not add up
Quick math:
UFC had 47 fights in 2014 & sched 45 for 2015
That is about 250k per event
They have about 20-24 fighters per event
That is roughly $10-12k per fighter
With payouts from $2,500 to $40,000 per, that is within a realistic % to give - nowhere near 40%
A card with one title fight has $180k (after the main event) to be split between 22 fighters - that is an average of $8k per fighter
If they have 20 title fights per year, that is about $8.4 million of the $70m (not counting if there is escalating payouts)
That leaves $61.6 million or roughly $10m per year for about 460-500 fights
No idea where the 40% came from. Whomever started that, must have made a mistake
But I see people quoting that 40% figure & it does not add up
Quick math:
UFC had 47 fights in 2014 & sched 45 for 2015
That is about 250k per event
They have about 20-24 fighters per event
That is roughly $10-12k per fighter
With payouts from $2,500 to $40,000 per, that is within a realistic % to give - nowhere near 40%
A card with one title fight has $180k (after the main event) to be split between 22 fighters - that is an average of $8k per fighter
If they have 20 title fights per year, that is about $8.4 million of the $70m (not counting if there is escalating payouts)
That leaves $61.6 million or roughly $10m per year for about 460-500 fights
No idea where the 40% came from. Whomever started that, must have made a mistake