- Joined
- Jun 9, 2010
- Messages
- 9,662
- Reaction score
- 0
I imagine them under Pride rules in a ring, because I think that the most fair ruleset and the most fair setting.
Granted, there were no elbows (which was good for face longevity and it avoided those damn cuts). Sure they are good weapons, but so are nut attacks.
The ring provides 4 pillars for wall and stall, a floor for ground work, ropes for boundaries, but fights get put in the middle of the ring when deep in the ropes.
The ring is a good mixture of a room and open field.
Cage is just a room and it favours grapplers. Elbows, but no upkicks, knees, soccer kicks to the head of the grounded opponent. This suits wrestlers too.
Making this illegal is idiotic and very unfair towards the guy on the bottom:
Granted, there were no elbows (which was good for face longevity and it avoided those damn cuts). Sure they are good weapons, but so are nut attacks.
The ring provides 4 pillars for wall and stall, a floor for ground work, ropes for boundaries, but fights get put in the middle of the ring when deep in the ropes.
The ring is a good mixture of a room and open field.
Cage is just a room and it favours grapplers. Elbows, but no upkicks, knees, soccer kicks to the head of the grounded opponent. This suits wrestlers too.
Making this illegal is idiotic and very unfair towards the guy on the bottom: