Middle of the road guy, like most here. Anything from 140 all the way to light heavy is where I feel the best mix of KO power, athleticism/fluidity of skill, and honestly competitive depth lies. I'm like some, HW really decides the baddest man on the planet, but sometimes the big guys dont deliver the action because of their size and clumsiness, but size matters. I'm a smaller guy, and I'm used to the frenetic pace lightweight competitors have in combat sports from my own wrestling days, but the middle of the road weights can be just as insane and you are dealing with bigger men who can in boxing's case, hit much harder. The stakes and likelihood of a stoppage just feels bigger. And in boxing you have the money divisions really starting at 147, so the competition is just more worth watching because you have depth and more cards mean more imo. I think this is also a law of averages, and I think more adult men find themselves in the 130-175 range than in the super big or super small size range... might be dependent where you are from, I'm talking shit out my ass at this point, but we know the talent dense parts of the world, so might be a fun discussion. But the combination, that best of both worlds feeling almost all the way up to Cruiser (hell even cruiser is exciting lately) is really why I am very interested to know the outcome and career paths of 147, 154, 160, 168, 175 fighters. I might be wrong about competitive depth across those divisions, I know in the lower weights theres been some noise, I really like Estrada, and I also know some of the weightclasses I favor aren't having the best era, but I'll take a matchup like Gman vs Benn or more recently Canelo vs just about anyone over a HW tilt or a LW bout.